Literature DB >> 12661192

The micromechanical environment of intervertebral disc cells determined by a finite deformation, anisotropic, and biphasic finite element model.

Anthony E Baer1, Tod A Laursen, Farshid Guilak, Lori A Setton.   

Abstract

Cellular response to mechanical loading varies between the anatomic zones of the intervertebral disc. This difference may be related to differences in the structure and mechanics of both cells and extracellular matrix, which are expected to cause differences in the physical stimuli (such as pressure, stress, and strain) in the cellular micromechanical environment. In this study, a finite element model was developed that was capable of describing the cell micromechanical environment in the intervertebral disc. The model was capable of describing a number of important mechanical phenomena: flow-dependent viscoelasticity using the biphasic theory for soft tissues; finite deformation effects using a hyperelastic constitutive law for the solid phase; and material anisotropy by including a fiber-reinforced continuum law in the hyperelastic strain energy function. To construct accurate finite element meshes, the in situ geometry of IVD cells were measured experimentally using laser scanning confocal microscopy and three-dimensional reconstruction techniques. The model predicted that the cellular micromechanical environment varies dramatically between the anatomic zones, with larger cellular strains predicted in the anisotropic anulus fibrosus and transition zone compared to the isotropic nucleus pulposus. These results suggest that deformation related stimuli may dominate for anulus fibrosus and transition zone cells, while hydrostatic pressurization may dominate in the nucleus pulposus. Furthermore, the model predicted that micromechanical environment is strongly influenced by cell geometry, suggesting that the geometry of IVD cells in situ may be an adaptation to reduce cellular strains during tissue loading.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12661192     DOI: 10.1115/1.1532790

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech Eng        ISSN: 0148-0731            Impact factor:   2.097


  26 in total

1.  Micromechanical mapping of early osteoarthritic changes in the pericellular matrix of human articular cartilage.

Authors:  R E Wilusz; S Zauscher; F Guilak
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2013-09-08       Impact factor: 6.576

2.  A numerical study to determine pericellular matrix modulus and evaluate its effects on the micromechanical environment of chondrocytes.

Authors:  Arthur J Michalek; James C Iatridis
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2006-07-25       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Three-dimensional morphology of the pericellular matrix of intervertebral disc cells in the rat.

Authors:  Li Cao; Farshid Guilak; Lori A Setton
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2007-08-02       Impact factor: 2.610

4.  Equivalence between short-time biphasic and incompressible elastic material responses.

Authors:  Gerard A Ateshian; Benjamin J Ellis; Jeffrey A Weiss
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.097

Review 5.  The role of extracellular matrix elasticity and composition in regulating the nucleus pulposus cell phenotype in the intervertebral disc: a narrative review.

Authors:  Priscilla Y Hwang; Jun Chen; Liufang Jing; Brenton D Hoffman; Lori A Setton
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.097

6.  Transfer of macroscale tissue strain to microscale cell regions in the deformed meniscus.

Authors:  Maureen L Upton; Christopher L Gilchrist; Farshid Guilak; Lori A Setton
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2008-05-16       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Self-assembly of aligned tissue-engineered annulus fibrosus and intervertebral disc composite via collagen gel contraction.

Authors:  Robby D Bowles; Rebecca M Williams; Warren R Zipfel; Lawrence J Bonassar
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.845

8.  Nucleotomy reduces the effects of cyclic compressive loading with unloaded recovery on human intervertebral discs.

Authors:  Brent L Showalter; Neil R Malhotra; Edward J Vresilovic; Dawn M Elliott
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 9.  The effects of dynamic loading on the intervertebral disc.

Authors:  Samantha C W Chan; Stephen J Ferguson; Benjamin Gantenbein-Ritter
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 10.  Biomechanics and mechanobiology in functional tissue engineering.

Authors:  Farshid Guilak; David L Butler; Steven A Goldstein; Frank P T Baaijens
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 2.712

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.