Literature DB >> 12660639

Shortened length of stay and hospital cost reduction with implementation of an accelerated clinical care pathway after elective colon resection.

Antonia E Stephen1, David L Berger.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patient care pathways have been developed for operative procedures with documented improvements in length of stay and cost without compromising outcome. The average hospital stay after colonic resection is 5 to 10 days. This study describes a clinical pathway for colon resections and examines patient outcome before and after institution of the pathway.
METHODS: One hundred thirty-eight patients underwent elective colon resections at our institution by a single surgeon before (n = 52) and after (n = 86) introduction of a clinical pathway. Length of stay, postoperative complications, readmissions, and cost per patient were compared between the 2 groups.
RESULTS: Mean total length of stay (+/- standard deviation [SD]) was less in the postclinical pathway patients (3.7 +/- 1.5 days) compared to preclinical pathway patients (6.6 +/- 3.3 days) (P <.001). When adjusted for age, sex, diagnosis, and type of operation, the difference in length of stay remains statistically significant (P <.001). There was 1 readmission in the prepathway group and 8 readmissions in the postpathway group. When the readmissions were added to the original admissions, the mean length of stay in the postpathway patients was 4.2 +/- 2.8 days and in the prepathway patients was 6.9 +/- 4.1 days (P <.001). The average cost per patient (+/- standard error of the mean), with readmission costs added, was 9310 +/- 5170 US dollars in the prepathway group and 7070 +/- 3670 US dollars in the postpathway group (P =.002).
CONCLUSIONS: The institution of a clinical pathway for elective, open colon resections can be done safely with improvements in cost and length of stay.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12660639     DOI: 10.1067/msy.2003.19

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  53 in total

Review 1.  Fast-track programmes for hepatopancreatic resections: where do we stand?

Authors:  Lidewij Spelt; Daniel Ansari; Christian Sturesson; Bobby Tingstedt; Roland Andersson
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2011-09-26       Impact factor: 3.647

2.  A systematic review of enhanced recovery protocols in colorectal surgery.

Authors:  A Rawlinson; P Kang; J Evans; A Khanna
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  Laparoscopic-assisted and open high anterior resection within an ERAS protocol.

Authors:  Ulf O Gustafsson; Marit Tiefenthal; Anders Thorell; Olle Ljungqvist; Jonas Nygrens
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Fast track colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Timothy C Counihan; Joanne Favuzza
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2009-02

5.  Influence of size and complexity of the hospitals in an enhanced recovery programme for colorectal resection.

Authors:  Antonio Arroyo; José Manuel Ramirez; Daniel Callejo; Xavier Viñas; Sergio Maeso; Roger Cabezali; Elena Miranda
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-05-27       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Operative time is a poor surrogate for the learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Authors:  W Chen; E Sailhamer; D L Berger; D W Rattner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-12-16       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Novel clinical staging for patients with end-stage gastrointestinal carcinoma.

Authors:  Naokuni Yasuda; Osamu Nakashima; Toru Ohnaka; Koji Kamisaka; Akira Tsunoda; Mitsuo Kusano
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 8.  Clinical Pathways in surgery: should we introduce them into clinical routine? A review article.

Authors:  Ulrich Ronellenfitsch; Eric Rössner; Jens Jakob; Stefan Post; Peter Hohenberger; Matthias Schwarzbach
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2008-02-23       Impact factor: 3.445

9.  "Fast-track" rehabilitation for elective colonic surgery in Germany--prospective observational data from a multi-centre quality assurance programme.

Authors:  W Schwenk; N Günther; P Wendling; M Schmid; W Probst; K Kipfmüller; B Rumstadt; M K Walz; R Engemann; T Junghans
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2007-08-18       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  ERAS protocol validation in a propensity-matched cohort of patients undergoing colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Riccardo Lemini; Aaron C Spaulding; James M Naessens; Zhuo Li; Amit Merchea; Julia E Crook; David W Larson; Dorin T Colibaseanu
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-07-21       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.