Literature DB >> 12660280

Is laparoscopy still the gold standard in infertility assessment? A comparison of fertiloscopy versus laparoscopy in infertility. Results of an international multicentre prospective trial: the 'FLY' (Fertiloscopy-LaparoscopY) study.

A Watrelot1, M Nisolle, H Chelli, C Hocke, C Rongières, C Racinet.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this prospective multicentre study was to compare the two endoscopic techniques of laparoscopy and fertiloscopy in routine evaluation of the pelvis in infertile women.
METHODS: A total of 92 women was selected in 14 University Hospitals to undergo fertiloscopy followed by transabdominal laparoscopy by a team of two surgeons in each hospital.
RESULTS: A high degree of concordance was observed between these two techniques, in that if fertiloscopy did not detect any abnormalities, this was also confirmed by laparoscopy. Discordance was observed in similar numbers of cases: eight after laparoscopy and nine after fertiloscopy. The diagnostic index for fertiloscopy and laparoscopy was calculated; sensitivity (86 and 87% respectively) and negative predictive value (64 and 67% respectively) were similar. The kappa index was also calculated for each of the six structures/regions (right/left tube; right/left ovary; peritoneum of pouch of Douglas; posterior uterus), and concordance (0.78 to 0.91) was considered almost complete.
CONCLUSIONS: These results confirm fertiloscopy as a minimally invasive safe procedure that may be considered as an alternative to diagnostic laparoscopy in the routine assessment of women without clinical or ultrasound evidence of pelvic disease. On the basis of the additional advantages of fertiloscopy, namely salpingoscopy or microsalpingoscopy, it is considered that fertiloscopy could replace laparoscopy as a routine procedure in such women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12660280     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deg180

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  7 in total

1.  Assessing tubal damage.

Authors:  Madhuri Patil
Journal:  J Hum Reprod Sci       Date:  2009-01

Review 2.  Low-cost in vitro fertilization: current insights.

Authors:  Pek Joo Teoh; Abha Maheshwari
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2014-08-21

3.  The Prevalence of Incidental Endometriosis in Women Undergoing Laparoscopic Ovarian Drilling for Clomiphene-Resistant Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Retrospective Cohort Study and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Marlene Hager; René Wenzl; Sonja Riesenhuber; Julian Marschalek; Lorenz Kuessel; Daniel Mayrhofer; Robin Ristl; Christine Kurz; Johannes Ott
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 4.  Diagnostic laparoscopy for unexplained subfertility: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Wissam Arab
Journal:  JBRA Assist Reprod       Date:  2022-01-17

5.  Systematic use of transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy as a minimally invasive procedure in the exploration of the infertile patient: results and reflections.

Authors:  S Gordts; Sy Gordts; P Puttemans; I Segaert; M Valkenburg; R Campo
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2021-06

Review 6.  Transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy.

Authors:  N Adaobi Ezedinma; John Y Phelps
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2012 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

7.  Ovarian drilling in polycystic ovary syndrome: Long term pregnancy rate.

Authors:  E Debras; H Fernandez; M-E Neveu; X Deffieux; P Capmas
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X       Date:  2019-08-13
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.