BACKGROUND: Appropriate shock therapy (AST) occurs in the minority of patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs). We assessed which patients received AST and whether there were any predictive factors. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed data from 155 patients implanted with ICDs at our institution from a period from February 1984 to February 2001. Stored electrogram data were analysed. We sub-divided patients on the basis of underlying cardiac disease. Various clinical echocardiographic and electrophysiological variables were studied. RESULTS: AST occurred in 53 (34%) of patients (Group 1) and no AST in 102 (64%) of patients (Group 2). Impaired LV function was significantly associated with AST. Group 1 patients had a lower ejection fraction (EF) compared to Group 2 (37.5+/-13% vs. 47.8+/-14%, P<0.0001). Seventy-two percent of patients with AST had an EF <40% vs. 35% of patients in Group 2 (P<0.0001). NYHA Class was also associated with AST, 42% of Group 1 were in NYHA Class III/IV vs. 12% in Group 2 (P<0.001). Programmed electrical stimulation (PES) was a predictor of AST. PES was positive in a greater proportion of patients in Group 1 vs. 2 (88% vs. 64%, P<0.0006). Sub-group analysis showed that patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) had a high incidence of AST (80%). In these patients PES was a poor predictor of AST being positive in only 25%. CONCLUSION: AST occurs in the minority of our patients. Certain pre-procedural variables predict AST. PES does not appear useful in predicting shock therapy in DCM patients and a negative PES should not preclude ICD implantation in this group.
BACKGROUND: Appropriate shock therapy (AST) occurs in the minority of patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs). We assessed which patients received AST and whether there were any predictive factors. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed data from 155 patients implanted with ICDs at our institution from a period from February 1984 to February 2001. Stored electrogram data were analysed. We sub-divided patients on the basis of underlying cardiac disease. Various clinical echocardiographic and electrophysiological variables were studied. RESULTS: AST occurred in 53 (34%) of patients (Group 1) and no AST in 102 (64%) of patients (Group 2). Impaired LV function was significantly associated with AST. Group 1 patients had a lower ejection fraction (EF) compared to Group 2 (37.5+/-13% vs. 47.8+/-14%, P<0.0001). Seventy-two percent of patients with AST had an EF <40% vs. 35% of patients in Group 2 (P<0.0001). NYHA Class was also associated with AST, 42% of Group 1 were in NYHA Class III/IV vs. 12% in Group 2 (P<0.001). Programmed electrical stimulation (PES) was a predictor of AST. PES was positive in a greater proportion of patients in Group 1 vs. 2 (88% vs. 64%, P<0.0006). Sub-group analysis showed that patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) had a high incidence of AST (80%). In these patientsPES was a poor predictor of AST being positive in only 25%. CONCLUSION: AST occurs in the minority of our patients. Certain pre-procedural variables predict AST. PES does not appear useful in predicting shock therapy in DCMpatients and a negative PES should not preclude ICD implantation in this group.
Authors: Emily P Zeitler; Sana M Al-Khatib; Daniel J Friedman; Joo Yoon Han; Jeanne E Poole; Gust H Bardy; J Thomas Bigger; Alfred E Buxton; Arthur J Moss; Kerry L Lee; Paul Dorian; Riccardo Cappato; Alan H Kadish; Peter J Kudenchuk; Daniel B Mark; Lurdes Y T Inoue; Gillian D Sanders Journal: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Date: 2017-08-23