Literature DB >> 12659920

A theoretical study of acoustic cavitation produced by "positive-only" and "negative-only" pressure waves in relation to in vivo studies.

Charles C Church1.   

Abstract

This study investigated the responses of gas bubbles in water, "viscous water" or "lung surfactant" exposed to "positive-only" or "negative-only" pressure pulses. The computational results obtained were compared to the in vivo experimental findings of Bailey et al. (1996), for the thresholds for, and extents of, biological damage endpoints in Drosophila larvae and mouse lungs exposed to similar pressure pulses. It is shown that, if cavitation were the mechanism responsible for these biologic effects, the two pulse types would be expected to produce very different thresholds and amounts of damage unless: 1. the bubbles involved were larger than the linear resonance radius, or 2. the cavitational activity were located within a fraction of a wavelength of an air-tissue interface. A noncavitational, acoustic force mechanism for the effects also is considered. Finally, it is suggested that the mechanical index may require modification when the focus of the acoustic field lies near an air-tissue interface.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12659920     DOI: 10.1016/s0301-5629(02)00731-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  2 in total

1.  Cavitation clouds created by shock scattering from bubbles during histotripsy.

Authors:  Adam D Maxwell; Tzu-Yin Wang; Charles A Cain; J Brian Fowlkes; Oleg A Sapozhnikov; Michael R Bailey; Zhen Xu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Photoacoustic generation of focused quasi-unipolar pressure pulses.

Authors:  Konstantin Maslov; Hao F Zhang; Lihong V Wang
Journal:  J Innov Opt Health Sci       Date:  2010-01-01
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.