Literature DB >> 12659807

Forest certification--an instrument to promote sustainable forest management?

Ewald Rametsteiner1, Markku Simula.   

Abstract

Forest certification was introduced in the early 1990s to address concerns of deforestation and forest degradation and to promote the maintenance of biological diversity, especially in the tropics. Initially pushed by environmental groups, it quickly evolved as a potential instrument to promote sustainable forest management (SFM). To date about 124 million ha or 3.2% of the world's forests have been certified by the different certification schemes created over the last decade. Forest certification shares the aim of promoting SFM with another tool, namely criteria and indicators (C&I) for SFM. C&I sets are mainly developed for the national level to describe and monitor status and trends in forests and forest management. They also provide an essential reference basis for forest certification standards, which set performance targets to be applied on a defined area. Progress in developing these two different tools has been significant. After 10 years of implementation, it is evident that the original intention to save tropical biodiversity through certification has largely failed to date. Most of certified areas are in the temperate and boreal zone, with Europe as the most important region. Only around ten per cent is located in tropical countries. The standards used for issuing certificates upon compliance are diverse, both between certification schemes and within one and the same scheme when applied in different regions. However, they are at least equal to legal requirements and often include elements that set actually higher standards. While the quality of actual audits of the standards is of varying quality, there are indications that independent audits are an incentive for improving forest management. As a voluntary market-based tool, forest certification is depending on the ability to cover the costs incurred and thus on often-elusive green consumer sentiment. Regardless of many difficulties, forest certification has been very successful in raising awareness and disseminating knowledge on a holistic SFM concept, embracing economic, environmental and social issues, worldwide. It also provides a tool for a range of other applications than assessment of sustainability, such as e.g. verifying carbon sinks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12659807     DOI: 10.1016/s0301-4797(02)00191-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Manage        ISSN: 0301-4797            Impact factor:   6.789


  8 in total

1.  Measuring biodiversity and sustainable management in forests and agricultural landscapes.

Authors:  Nigel Dudley; David Baldock; Robert Nasi; Sue Stolton
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2005-02-28       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Current status and problems in certification of sustainable forest management in China.

Authors:  Jingzhu Zhao; Dongming Xie; Danyin Wang; Hongbing Deng
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 3.266

Review 3.  Impacts of forestry on boreal forests: An ecosystem services perspective.

Authors:  Tähti Pohjanmies; María Triviño; Eric Le Tortorec; Adriano Mazziotta; Tord Snäll; Mikko Mönkkönen
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2017-04-22       Impact factor: 5.129

4.  Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) pesticide policy and integrated pest management in certified tropical plantations.

Authors:  Pedro Guilherme Lemes; José Cola Zanuncio; José Eduardo Serrão; Simon A Lawson
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-10-22       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 5.  Conceptual framework for increasing legitimacy and trust of sustainability governance.

Authors:  Inge Stupak; Maha Mansoor; C Tattersall Smith
Journal:  Energy Sustain Soc       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 2.811

6.  Which practices co-deliver food security, climate change mitigation and adaptation, and combat land degradation and desertification?

Authors:  Pete Smith; Katherine Calvin; Johnson Nkem; Donovan Campbell; Francesco Cherubini; Giacomo Grassi; Vladimir Korotkov; Anh Le Hoang; Shuaib Lwasa; Pamela McElwee; Ephraim Nkonya; Nobuko Saigusa; Jean-Francois Soussana; Miguel Angel Taboada; Frances C Manning; Dorothy Nampanzira; Cristina Arias-Navarro; Matteo Vizzarri; Jo House; Stephanie Roe; Annette Cowie; Mark Rounsevell; Almut Arneth
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2019-12-14       Impact factor: 13.211

7.  The role of communities in sustainable land and forest management: The case of Nyanga, Zvimba and Guruve districts of Zimbabwe.

Authors:  Diego Matsvange; Ruvimbo Sagonda; Munyaradzi Kaundikiza
Journal:  Jamba       Date:  2016-05-11

8.  Evidence-based knowledge versus negotiated indicators for assessment of ecological sustainability: the Swedish Forest Stewardship Council standard as a case study.

Authors:  Per Angelstam; Jean-Michel Roberge; Robert Axelsson; Marine Elbakidze; Karl-Olof Bergman; Anders Dahlberg; Erik Degerman; Sönke Eggers; Per-Anders Esseen; Joakim Hjältén; Therese Johansson; Jörg Müller; Heidi Paltto; Tord Snäll; Ihor Soloviy; Johan Törnblom
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 5.129

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.