Literature DB >> 12659804

Silvicultural management in maintaining biodiversity and resistance of forests in Europe-temperate zone.

Heinrich Spiecker1.   

Abstract

In Europe temperate forests play a prominent role in timber production, nature protection, water conservation, erosion control and recreation. For centuries temperate forests in Europe have been affected by forest devastation and soil degradation. Applying great efforts to eliminate the severe wood shortage of those days, countermeasures were taken during the last 150 years by regenerating and tending highly productive forests. High growth rates and an increasing growing stock of these forests indicate that formerly stated goals have been successfully achieved. Coniferous species were often favoured because they were easy to establish and manage, and gave reason for high volume growth expectations. Today coniferous forests expand far beyond the limits of their natural ranges. These changes have been accompanied by a loss of biodiversity, a shift to nonsite adapted tree species and reduce the resistance against storms, snow, ice, droughts, insects and fungi. Some of these hazards were further intensified by the increasing average stand age, as well as in some areas by severe air pollution. Climatic fluctuations, especially changes in the frequency and intensity of extreme warm and dry climatic conditions and of heavy storms, had considerable impact on forest ecosystems. The changing demands of today require a widened scope of forest management. Society is asking for sustainable forestry emphasizing biodiversity and naturalistic forest management. It is of great economic and ecological relevance to know on which sites today's forests are most susceptible to climatic and other environmental changes and hazards. In those areas adjustments of management through a conversion the prevailing forests towards more site adapted mixed forests needs to be considered with priority. The high diversity in site conditions, ownership, economic and socio-cultural conditions require strategies adapted to the local and regional needs. Higher resistance of forests will increase economic and social benefits of forests and reduce the risks by maintaining sustainable forestry.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12659804     DOI: 10.1016/s0301-4797(02)00188-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Manage        ISSN: 0301-4797            Impact factor:   6.789


  9 in total

1.  How socio-economic conditions influence forest policy development in Central and South-east Europe.

Authors:  Dijana Vuletić; Nenad Potočić; Silvija Krajter; Ivan Seletković; Christine Fürst; Franz Makeschin; Zoran Galić; Carsten Lorz; Dragan Matijašič; Matjaž Zupanič; Primož Simončič; Harald Vacik
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  How to support forest management in a world of change: results of some regional studies.

Authors:  C Fürst; C Lorz; H Vacik; N Potocic; F Makeschin
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2009-08-29       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Reconciling Biodiversity Conservation and Timber Production in Mixed Uneven-Aged Mountain Forests: Identification of Ecological Intensification Pathways.

Authors:  Valentine Lafond; Thomas Cordonnier; Benoît Courbaud
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 3.266

Review 4.  The Vision of Managing for Pest-Resistant Landscapes: Realistic or Utopic?

Authors:  Daniel D Kneeshaw; Brian R Sturtevant; Louis DeGrandpé; Enrique Doblas-Miranda; Patrick M A James; Dominique Tardif; Philip J Burton
Journal:  Curr For Rep       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 10.975

5.  Evaluating the suitability of management strategies of pure Norway spruce forests in the Black Forest area of southwest Germany for adaptation to or mitigation of climate change.

Authors:  Rasoul Yousefpour; Marc Hanewinkel; Gilles Le Moguédec
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 3.266

6.  Quantifying the detrimental impacts of land-use and management change on European forest bird populations.

Authors:  Amy S I Wade; Boris Barov; Ian J Burfield; Richard D Gregory; Ken Norris; Simon J Butler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Afforested farmland vs. forestland: Effects of bark stripping by Cervus elaphus and climate on production potential and structure of Picea abies forests.

Authors:  Jan Cukor; Zdeněk Vacek; Rostislav Linda; Ram Prasad Sharma; Stanislav Vacek
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-15       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  How does contemporary selection shape oak phenotypes?

Authors:  Hermine Alexandre; Laura Truffaut; Etienne Klein; Alexis Ducousso; Emilie Chancerel; Isabelle Lesur; Benjamin Dencausse; Jean-Marc Louvet; Gérard Nepveu; José M Torres-Ruiz; Frédéric Lagane; Brigitte Musch; Sylvain Delzon; Antoine Kremer
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2020-08-14       Impact factor: 5.183

9.  Genetic diversity of Norway spruce ecotypes assessed by GBS-derived SNPs.

Authors:  Jiří Korecký; Jaroslav Čepl; Jan Stejskal; Zuzana Faltinová; Jakub Dvořák; Milan Lstibůrek; Yousry A El-Kassaby
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.