Literature DB >> 12659057

Improving hypertension care in a large group-model MCO.

Paul Godley1, Anh Nguyen, Krista Yokoyama, James Rohack, Billy Woodward, Tina Chiang.   

Abstract

The effectiveness of a quality improvement program for hypertension management practices and patient health outcomes in a group-model managed care organization was evaluated. Health-system pharmacists analyzed medical and pharmacy claims data to identify hypertensive patients. Chart review was conducted on a random sample of these patients to validate a hypertension diagnosis and to obtain blood pressure (BP) control rates and prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors and comorbid conditions. The interventions consisted of educating health care providers and recommending appropriate pharmacotherapy for compelling indications. Patient outcomes were compared with baseline hypertension data. After interventions were implemented, medical and pharmacy claims identified 30,721 hypertensive patients and chart reviews were performed on a random sample of 417 patients. Pharmacy claims revealed a total of 193,311 antihypertensive prescriptions. Approximately 47% of all hypertensive patients were managed with monotherapy, while 24% received dual therapy, and 11% were taking three or more antihypertensive medications per day. Of the patients on monotherapy, 93% received an angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor (27.3%), diuretic (26.6%), beta-blocker (23.4%), or calcium channel blocker (15.4%). The overall level of BP control significantly improved from 37.2% at baseline to 49.2% at follow-up (p = 0.0007). BP control in the follow-up evaluation was 22.2% in diabetic patients. For treatment of patients with comorbid disease states, provider practice patterns were evaluated at baseline and follow-up. Improving the quality of hypertension management increased BP control from 37.2% to 49.2%. Continued efforts to improve hypertension management, particularly in patients with concomitant diabetes and in elderly patients with isolated systolic hypertension, are needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12659057     DOI: 10.1093/ajhp/60.6.554

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm        ISSN: 1079-2082            Impact factor:   2.637


  6 in total

1.  Quality measurement as a prerequisite for improving hypertension control in an academic medical center.

Authors:  Fani E Syrrokosta; Konstantinos M Lampropoulos; Ioannis Papargyriou; Dimitrios Papadogiannis
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 2.882

2.  [Assessment of electronic medical records. Relationship between process indicators measured using electronic records and intermediate health outcomes in patients with hypertension].

Authors:  Gerardo Garzón González; David Rodríguez Morales; Miguel Ángel Rodríguez Palomino; David Toledo Gómez; Valentín Hernández Barrera; Angel Gil De Miguel
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 1.137

Review 3.  Systems for care of hypertension in the United States.

Authors:  Lawrence R Krakoff
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.738

4.  Patterns and associated health services costs of antihypertensive drug modifications.

Authors:  Shadi S Saleh; Steven Szebenyi; Judith A Carter; Chris Zacher; Dan Belletti
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.738

5.  Quality of care for hypertension in the United States.

Authors:  Steven M Asch; Elizabeth A McGlynn; Liisa Hiatt; John Adams; Jennifer Hicks; Alison DeCristofaro; Roland Chen; Pablo LaPuerta; Eve A Kerr
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2005-01-07       Impact factor: 2.298

6.  A comparison of the quality of hypertension management in primary care between Shanghai and Shenzhen: a cohort study of 3196 patients.

Authors:  Haitao Li; Xiaolin Wei; Martin C Wong; Nan Yang; Samuel Y Wong; Xiangqian Lao; Sian M Griffiths
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.889

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.