OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to analyse the results and long term outcome in a prospective non randomised trial of 74 patients treated by laparoscopic colo-rectal resection for cancer, and to determine wether survival and recurrence are or are not compromised by an initial laparoscopic approach. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-four patients with colo-rectal carcinoma were included in a prospective trial and treated by laparoscopic resection. All patients were reviewed at 1, 3, and 6 months interval. A median of 5 years follow up was available. Forty-eight patients (65%) had more than 3 years of follow up. RESULTS: Six conversions (8.1%) were necessary: 2 for tumor invasion of adjacent organs, 2 for limited margin resection in lower rectal tumors, 1 for small bowel injury and 1 for obesity. After surgery, passing flatus occurred at 34.3 +/- 16.7 h and oral intake could be reinstaured at 42.6 +/- 22 h. Mean postoperative stay was 8.2 +/- 3.4 days. No death occurred. The overall morbidity was about 13.5%. The rate of late complications was 5.4%. Two port site metastasis (2.6%) were seen in locally advanced carcinoma. Recurrence rate at 5 years was 0% for Dukes A, 20% for Dukes B, 39.2% for Dukes C. Survival rate at 5 years was 100% for Dukes A, 80% for Dukes B, and 60.7% for Dukes C. These results are similar to those of conventional open surgery. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic colorectal resection for cancer can be performed safely, with a low morbidity and rare late complications. Long term follow up (5 years) assessment shows similar outcome compared with conventional surgery.
OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to analyse the results and long term outcome in a prospective non randomised trial of 74 patients treated by laparoscopic colo-rectal resection for cancer, and to determine wether survival and recurrence are or are not compromised by an initial laparoscopic approach. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-four patients with colo-rectal carcinoma were included in a prospective trial and treated by laparoscopic resection. All patients were reviewed at 1, 3, and 6 months interval. A median of 5 years follow up was available. Forty-eight patients (65%) had more than 3 years of follow up. RESULTS: Six conversions (8.1%) were necessary: 2 for tumor invasion of adjacent organs, 2 for limited margin resection in lower rectal tumors, 1 for small bowel injury and 1 for obesity. After surgery, passing flatus occurred at 34.3 +/- 16.7 h and oral intake could be reinstaured at 42.6 +/- 22 h. Mean postoperative stay was 8.2 +/- 3.4 days. No death occurred. The overall morbidity was about 13.5%. The rate of late complications was 5.4%. Two port site metastasis (2.6%) were seen in locally advanced carcinoma. Recurrence rate at 5 years was 0% for Dukes A, 20% for Dukes B, 39.2% for Dukes C. Survival rate at 5 years was 100% for Dukes A, 80% for Dukes B, and 60.7% for Dukes C. These results are similar to those of conventional open surgery. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic colorectal resection for cancer can be performed safely, with a low morbidity and rare late complications. Long term follow up (5 years) assessment shows similar outcome compared with conventional surgery.