Literature DB >> 12658756

Magnetic stimulation accelerating rehabilitation of peripheral nerve injury.

Ahmed Bannaga1, Tiecheng Guo, Xingbiao Ouyang, Daosong Hu, Chuanyou Lin, Fuyuan Cao, Yunping Deng, Zhengcheng Guo, Yongxiang Luo.   

Abstract

The effect of magnetic stimulation (MS) on sciatic nerve injury was observed. After sciatic nerve was crushed in 40 Sprague Dawley (SD) rats, one randomly selected group (group D) was subjected, from the 4th day post-operatively to 3 min of continuous 70% of maximum output of MS daily for 8 weeks. The other group (group E) served as a control group. The nerve regeneration and motor function recovery were evaluated by walking track analysis (sciatic function index, SFI; toe spreading reflex, TSR), electrophysiological, histological and acetylcholineesterase histochemistry. The SFI in the group D was greater than in the group E with the difference being statistically significant (P < 0.01). TSR reached its peak on the 4th day in the group D and on the 10th day in the group E respectively. The amplitude and velocity of MCAP and NCAP in the group D was greater than in the group E with the difference being statistically significant (P < 0.01), while the latency and duration of MCAP and NCAP in the group D were less than in the group E with the difference being also statistically significant (P < 0.01). Histological examination showed the mean axon count above the lesion for thick myelinated fibers (> 6.5 microns) in the group D was greater than in the control group with the difference being statistically significant (P < 0.01), while the mean axon count below the lesion for thick myelinated fibers was less than that in the group E with the difference being statistically significant (P < 0.01). The mean axon count above the lesion for thin myelinated fibers (2-6.5 microns) in the group D was greater than that in the group E with the difference being statistically significant (P < 0.05), while the mean axon count below the lesion for thin myelinated in the group D was greater than that in the group E with the difference being statistically significant (P < 0.01). Acetylcholine esterase examination showed that the MS could significantly increase the number of the motor neurons. There was no significant difference in the number of the motor neurons between the treatment side and the normal side (P > 0.05). It can be concluded that MS can enhance functional recovery and has a considerable effect in the treatment of the peripheral nerve injury.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12658756     DOI: 10.1007/BF02857676

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci        ISSN: 1672-0733


  13 in total

1.  A "DIRECT-COLORING" THIOCHOLINE METHOD FOR CHOLINESTERASES.

Authors:  M J KARNOVSKY; L ROOTS
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  1964-03       Impact factor: 2.479

2.  Experimental interfascicular nerve grafting.

Authors:  B R Bratton; D G Kline; W Coleman; A R Hudson
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 5.115

3.  Walking track analysis: a long-term assessment of peripheral nerve recovery.

Authors:  G M Hare; P J Evans; S E Mackinnon; T J Best; J R Bain; J P Szalai; D A Hunter
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 4.730

4.  Functional evaluation of complete sciatic, peroneal, and posterior tibial nerve lesions in the rat.

Authors:  J R Bain; S E Mackinnon; D A Hunter
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 4.730

5.  Is laser nerve repair comparable to microsuture coaptation?

Authors:  H Maragh; R S Hawn; J D Gould; J K Terzis
Journal:  J Reconstr Microsurg       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 2.873

6.  Histochemical methods for separate, consecutive and simultaneous demonstration of acetylcholinesterase and norepinephrine in cryostat sections.

Authors:  A El-Badawi; E A Schenk
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  1967-10       Impact factor: 2.479

7.  Numbers of regenerating axons in parent and tributary peripheral nerves in the rat.

Authors:  C B Jenq; R E Coggeshall
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1985-02-04       Impact factor: 3.252

8.  Regeneration of axons in tributary nerves.

Authors:  C B Jenq; R E Coggeshall
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1984-09-17       Impact factor: 3.252

9.  Comparison of methods of peripheral nerve suturing in monkeys.

Authors:  W C Grabb; S L Bement; G H Koepke; R A Green
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1970-07       Impact factor: 4.730

10.  Sciatic nerve regeneration in the rat. Validity of walking track assessment in the presence of chronic contractures.

Authors:  A L Dellon; S E Mackinnon
Journal:  Microsurgery       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.425

View more
  2 in total

1.  Impulse magnetic stimulation facilitates synaptic regeneration in rats following sciatic nerve injury.

Authors:  Sergey A Zhivolupov; Miroslav M Odinak; Nariman A Rashidov; Ludmila S Onischenko; Igor N Samartsev; Anton A Jurin
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 5.135

2.  Low-level laser irradiation improves functional recovery and nerve regeneration in sciatic nerve crush rat injury model.

Authors:  Chau-Zen Wang; Yi-Jen Chen; Yan-Hsiung Wang; Ming-Long Yeh; Mao-Hsiung Huang; Mei-Ling Ho; Jen-I Liang; Chia-Hsin Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.