Literature DB >> 12658340

[Successful management of abdominal stab wounds with clinical evaluation: experiences of an South-African trauma unit with 496 consecutive patients].

A Exadaktylos1, A Stettbacher, S Edul, A Nichols, P Bautz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Up to 80% of all operations performed in South African trauma units are due to penetrating injuries. This study will evaluate our own clinical guidelines for the management of penetrating abdominal injuries.
METHODS: Absolute indication for operation in patients with penetrating abdominal injuries have been: haemodynamic instability, evisceration of bowels or organs, peritonitis, free air under the diaphragm on plain abdominal x-rays, the evidence of fresh blood on rectal examination or in the stomach. No ultrasonography or CT scanning has been performed.
RESULTS: 496 patients were included in this study. In 248 (50%) patients an operation has been performed. 50 (20%) of them were initially selected for abdominal observation. In 230 (93%) patients, peritoneal penetration was diagnosed during laparotomy. In 18 (7%) patients the laparotomy was negative and in 24 (10%) non-therapeutic.6 (2%) patients died. Specifically 93.2% (CI 90.2-96.2%), positive prediction 92.7% (89.5%-95.7%).
CONCLUSION: The clinical evaluation of patients with abdominal stab wounds is a safe method to detect possible fatal injuries in hospitals without unlimited access to ultrasonography and CT scanning. 80% of all patients with a selective conservative approach needed no operation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12658340     DOI: 10.1007/s00113-002-0543-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Unfallchirurg        ISSN: 0177-5537            Impact factor:   1.000


  8 in total

1.  Penetrating trauma to the junctional zone needs aggressive management.

Authors:  J Ahmad; G C Beattie; R Kennedy; J A Kennedy; W D B Clements
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-02-03

2.  [Evisceration of intestines following abdominal stab wounds: epidemiology and clinical aspects of emergency room management].

Authors:  D Doll; E Matevossian; K Kayser; E Degiannis; C Hönemann
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  [Helical computed tomography in penetrating injury to the torso. Diagnostic value in emergent use].

Authors:  M Müller; C Burger; J Standop; A Kovacs; A Hirner; C Rangger; A Türler
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 0.955

4.  Penetrating thoracoabdominal injuries in Quebec: implications for surgical training and maintenance of competence.

Authors:  Eric Bergeron; Andre Lavoie; Tarek Razek; Amina Belcaid; Julie Lessard; David Clas
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.089

5.  Epidemiology and outcome of penetrating injuries in a Western European urban region.

Authors:  P Störmann; K Gartner; H Wyen; T Lustenberger; I Marzi; S Wutzler
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 3.693

6.  A study on initial outcome of selective non-operative management in penetrating abdominal injury in a tertiary care hospital in Bangladesh.

Authors:  Md Sumon Rahman; Kamrul Hasan; Hasal Ul Banna; Akm Maruf Raza; Tarafder Habibullah
Journal:  Turk J Surg       Date:  2019-06-13

7.  Differences in Characteristics and Outcome of Patients with Penetrating Injuries in the USA and the Netherlands: A Multi-institutional Comparison.

Authors:  Suzan Dijkink; Pieta Krijnen; Aglaia Hage; Gwendolyn M Van der Wilden; George Kasotakis; Dennis Den Hartog; Ali Salim; J Carel Goslings; Frank W Bloemers; Steven J Rhemrev; David R King; George C Velmahos; Inger B Schipper
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Free abdominal fluid without obvious solid organ injury upon CT imaging: an actual problem or simply over-diagnosing?

Authors:  Vanessa M Banz; Muhammad U Butt; Heinz Zimmermann; Victor Jeger; Aristomenis K Exadaktylos
Journal:  J Trauma Manag Outcomes       Date:  2009-12-15
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.