Literature DB >> 12657905

Interference with vision by TMS over the occipital pole: a fourth period.

Erik Corthout1, Mark Hallett, Alan Cowey.   

Abstract

We investigated the effect of single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over the occipital pole on a forced-choice visual letter-identification task. Magnetic stimuli were applied on the midline but with the initial current directed pseudorandomly toward either left or right hemisphere; visual stimuli were presented randomly in either left or right hemifield; magnetic-visual stimulus onset asynchrony varied randomly between 12 values: -500 ms and from -50 ms to +50 ms in 10 ms steps. The data revealed the existence of a hitherto unknown fourth task-interfering TMS effect that was maximal at -10 ms and specific for magnetic stimulus polarity and visual stimulus location. This -10 ms effect cannot be explained by reflex blinking (as the -50 ms effect can) and direct disruption of letter-induced activity (as the +20 ms and +100 ms effects can), but it could be explained by direct disruption of pre-letter activity or indirect disruption of letter-induced activity.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12657905     DOI: 10.1097/00001756-200303240-00026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroreport        ISSN: 0959-4965            Impact factor:   1.837


  12 in total

1.  The Ferrier Lecture 2004 what can transcranial magnetic stimulation tell us about how the brain works?

Authors:  Alan Cowey
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2005-06-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Masking visual stimuli by transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Thomas Kammer
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2006-04-27

3.  Is selective primary visual cortex stimulation achievable with TMS?

Authors:  Niina Salminen-Vaparanta; Valdas Noreika; Antti Revonsuo; Mika Koivisto; Simo Vanni
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Visual masking by transcranial magnetic stimulation in the first 80 milliseconds.

Authors:  Thomas Kammer
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2008-07-15

5.  Robot-assisted image-guided transcranial magnetic stimulation for somatotopic mapping of the motor cortex: a clinical pilot study.

Authors:  Sven Rainer Kantelhardt; Tommaso Fadini; Markus Finke; Kai Kallenberg; Jakob Siemerkus; Volker Bockermann; Lars Matthaeus; Walter Paulus; Achim Schweikard; Veit Rohde; Alf Giese
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2009-11-27       Impact factor: 2.216

6.  Novel 'hunting' method using transcranial magnetic stimulation over parietal cortex disrupts visuospatial sensitivity in relation to motor thresholds.

Authors:  R Oliver; O Bjoertomt; J Driver; R Greenwood; J Rothwell
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2009-08-03       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  TMS-induced blinking assessed with high-speed video: optical disruption of visual perception.

Authors:  Erik Corthout; Mark Hallett; Alan Cowey
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-03-23       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  A chronometric exploration of high-resolution 'sensitive TMS masking' effects on subjective and objective measures of vision.

Authors:  Tom A de Graaf; Jim Herring; Alexander T Sack
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Spatially specific vs. unspecific disruption of visual orientation perception using chronometric pre-stimulus TMS.

Authors:  Tom A de Graaf; Felix Duecker; Martin H P Fernholz; Alexander T Sack
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 3.558

10.  Assessing temporal processing of facial emotion perception with transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Yuri Rassovsky; Junghee Lee; Poorang Nori; Allan D Wu; Marco Iacoboni; Bruno G Breitmeyer; Gerhard Hellemann; Michael F Green
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 2.708

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.