Literature DB >> 12657622

Multifocal electroretinography as a function of age: the importance of normative values for older adults.

William Seiple1, Thasarat S Vajaranant, Janet P Szlyk, Colleen Clemens, Karen Holopigian, Jennifer Paliga, David Badawi, Ronald E Carr.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the influence of age on local electroretinographic responses in humans.
METHODS: Multifocal electroretinograms (mfERGs) were obtained from 62 normally sighted subjects ranging in age from 21 to 81 years. A stimulus array of 103 scaled hexagons was used to measure electrical signals within a retinal area approximately 46 degrees in diameter. Commonly reported mfERG methods were used to quantify the responses: peak-to-peak amplitudes and implicit times, scalar product amplitude, and amplitude and time scales derived from the algorithm of Hood and Li, published in 1997.
RESULTS: Regression analysis showed significant linear relationships of amplitude and timing measures with age. The rates of losses were 10.5% per decade for peak-to-peak amplitude, 11.7% per decade for scalar product amplitude, and 9.5% per decade for a-scale. The rate of amplitude reduction was highest in the central 3 degrees. Age had less influence on implicit time measures. The rates of timing losses were 1.4% per decade for the N1 component and 1.0% per decade for both the P1 component and the t-scale measure. Using predicted interval ranges, the age was calculated at which 50% of the expected values would fall below the lower 95% prediction interval band of younger subjects.
CONCLUSIONS: The age-associated mfERG alterations are presented to emphasize the importance of appropriate normative data in interpretation of mfERGs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12657622     DOI: 10.1167/iovs.02-0518

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  17 in total

1.  Senescence of human multifocal electroretinogram components: a localized approach.

Authors:  Radouil T Tzekov; Christina Gerth; John S Werner
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-04-15       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 2.  The electroretinogram: a useful tool for evaluating age-related macular disease?

Authors:  Emma J Berrow; Hannah E Bartlett; Frank Eperjesi; Jonathan M Gibson
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Deficits in the electroretinogram in neovascular age-related macular degeneration and changes during photodynamic therapy.

Authors:  Alison M Mackay; Malcolm C Brown; Richard P Hagan; Anthony C Fisher; Ian Grierson; Simon P Harding
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-08-02       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Assessing responses of the macula in patients with macular holes using a new system measuring localized visual acuity and the mfERG.

Authors:  Janet P Szlyk; Thasarat S Vajaranant; Rimki Rana; Wico W Lai; Jose S Pulido; Jennifer Paliga; Norman P Blair; William Seiple
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2005 Mar-May       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  Visual field and multifocal electroretinography and their correlations in patients on hydroxychloroquine therapy.

Authors:  Timothy Y Y Lai; Jasmine W S Ngai; Wai-Man Chan; Dennis S C Lam
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-06-28       Impact factor: 2.379

6.  Dynamics of retinal function after multiple photodynamic therapies in age-related macular degeneration: a report of cases.

Authors:  Beatrix Feigl; Brian Brown; Jan Lovie-Kitchin; Lawrence Lee
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-03-06       Impact factor: 2.379

7.  Macular function measured by binocular mfERG and compared with macular structure in healthy children.

Authors:  Anna E C Molnar; Sten O L Andreasson; Eva K B Larsson; Hanna M Åkerblom; Gerd E Holmström
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-10-18       Impact factor: 2.379

8.  Impact of contact lens materials on the mfERG response of the human retina.

Authors:  Ana Amorim-de-Sousa; Linda Moreira; Rute Macedo-de-Araújo; André Amorim; Jorge Jorge; Paulo R Fernandes; António Queirós; José M González-Méijome
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 2.379

9.  Evaluation of structural and functional changes in non-pathologic myopic fundus using multifocal electroretinogram and optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Saemi Park; Seung Hoon Kim; Tae Kwann Park; Young-Hoon Ohn
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-03-08       Impact factor: 2.379

10.  Differences in neuroretinal function between adult males and females.

Authors:  Glen Y Ozawa; Marcus A Bearse; Wendy W Harrison; Kevin W Bronson-Castain; Marilyn E Schneck; Shirin Barez; Anthony J Adams
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.973

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.