PURPOSE: To determine the influence of age on local electroretinographic responses in humans. METHODS: Multifocal electroretinograms (mfERGs) were obtained from 62 normally sighted subjects ranging in age from 21 to 81 years. A stimulus array of 103 scaled hexagons was used to measure electrical signals within a retinal area approximately 46 degrees in diameter. Commonly reported mfERG methods were used to quantify the responses: peak-to-peak amplitudes and implicit times, scalar product amplitude, and amplitude and time scales derived from the algorithm of Hood and Li, published in 1997. RESULTS: Regression analysis showed significant linear relationships of amplitude and timing measures with age. The rates of losses were 10.5% per decade for peak-to-peak amplitude, 11.7% per decade for scalar product amplitude, and 9.5% per decade for a-scale. The rate of amplitude reduction was highest in the central 3 degrees. Age had less influence on implicit time measures. The rates of timing losses were 1.4% per decade for the N1 component and 1.0% per decade for both the P1 component and the t-scale measure. Using predicted interval ranges, the age was calculated at which 50% of the expected values would fall below the lower 95% prediction interval band of younger subjects. CONCLUSIONS: The age-associated mfERG alterations are presented to emphasize the importance of appropriate normative data in interpretation of mfERGs.
PURPOSE: To determine the influence of age on local electroretinographic responses in humans. METHODS: Multifocal electroretinograms (mfERGs) were obtained from 62 normally sighted subjects ranging in age from 21 to 81 years. A stimulus array of 103 scaled hexagons was used to measure electrical signals within a retinal area approximately 46 degrees in diameter. Commonly reported mfERG methods were used to quantify the responses: peak-to-peak amplitudes and implicit times, scalar product amplitude, and amplitude and time scales derived from the algorithm of Hood and Li, published in 1997. RESULTS: Regression analysis showed significant linear relationships of amplitude and timing measures with age. The rates of losses were 10.5% per decade for peak-to-peak amplitude, 11.7% per decade for scalar product amplitude, and 9.5% per decade for a-scale. The rate of amplitude reduction was highest in the central 3 degrees. Age had less influence on implicit time measures. The rates of timing losses were 1.4% per decade for the N1 component and 1.0% per decade for both the P1 component and the t-scale measure. Using predicted interval ranges, the age was calculated at which 50% of the expected values would fall below the lower 95% prediction interval band of younger subjects. CONCLUSIONS: The age-associated mfERG alterations are presented to emphasize the importance of appropriate normative data in interpretation of mfERGs.
Authors: Alison M Mackay; Malcolm C Brown; Richard P Hagan; Anthony C Fisher; Ian Grierson; Simon P Harding Journal: Doc Ophthalmol Date: 2007-08-02 Impact factor: 2.379
Authors: Janet P Szlyk; Thasarat S Vajaranant; Rimki Rana; Wico W Lai; Jose S Pulido; Jennifer Paliga; Norman P Blair; William Seiple Journal: Doc Ophthalmol Date: 2005 Mar-May Impact factor: 2.379
Authors: Anna E C Molnar; Sten O L Andreasson; Eva K B Larsson; Hanna M Åkerblom; Gerd E Holmström Journal: Doc Ophthalmol Date: 2015-10-18 Impact factor: 2.379
Authors: Ana Amorim-de-Sousa; Linda Moreira; Rute Macedo-de-Araújo; André Amorim; Jorge Jorge; Paulo R Fernandes; António Queirós; José M González-Méijome Journal: Doc Ophthalmol Date: 2019-10-01 Impact factor: 2.379
Authors: Glen Y Ozawa; Marcus A Bearse; Wendy W Harrison; Kevin W Bronson-Castain; Marilyn E Schneck; Shirin Barez; Anthony J Adams Journal: Optom Vis Sci Date: 2014-06 Impact factor: 1.973