PURPOSE: National programs for trachoma control are implementing mass treatment programs in which azithromycin is used as part of the control strategy. Dose is determined by weight, which can be difficult to determine in field conditions. The purposes of this study were to determine whether an accurate dose could be determined by using height as a surrogate for weight and whether a single model of height-based dosage would be applicable in more than one setting. METHODS: Data on height, weight, age, and gender of 5558 children aged 6 months to15 years were obtained from Kongwa and Rombo, Tanzania; Malakal, Sudan; Jareng, The Gambia; and Daboya, Ghana. Models for predicting weight by measuring height were developed that incorporated country-specific parameters. Doses of azithromycin assumed suspension of 40 mg/mL and 250-mg tablets that could be halved. Tolerance limits were defined as 15 to 30 mg/kg. RESULTS: A regression model, predicting log weight as a function of log height, was the best fit and explained 94% of the variance. In children less than 1 year of age or 60 cm in height, dose determined by weight was preferred. Dosage by height resulted in more than 97% of children receiving doses within the tolerance limits. Children aged 1 to 2 years were the group most likely to be over- or undermedicated, but this occurred in only 6% of this age group. CONCLUSIONS: Height-based determination of dosage of azithromycin in trachoma control programs appears to be feasible, using the height-based schedule proposed. One model was adequate for all the countries in the study. Further expansion to other countries is warranted.
PURPOSE:National programs for trachoma control are implementing mass treatment programs in which azithromycin is used as part of the control strategy. Dose is determined by weight, which can be difficult to determine in field conditions. The purposes of this study were to determine whether an accurate dose could be determined by using height as a surrogate for weight and whether a single model of height-based dosage would be applicable in more than one setting. METHODS: Data on height, weight, age, and gender of 5558 children aged 6 months to15 years were obtained from Kongwa and Rombo, Tanzania; Malakal, Sudan; Jareng, The Gambia; and Daboya, Ghana. Models for predicting weight by measuring height were developed that incorporated country-specific parameters. Doses of azithromycin assumed suspension of 40 mg/mL and 250-mg tablets that could be halved. Tolerance limits were defined as 15 to 30 mg/kg. RESULTS: A regression model, predicting log weight as a function of log height, was the best fit and explained 94% of the variance. In children less than 1 year of age or 60 cm in height, dose determined by weight was preferred. Dosage by height resulted in more than 97% of children receiving doses within the tolerance limits. Children aged 1 to 2 years were the group most likely to be over- or undermedicated, but this occurred in only 6% of this age group. CONCLUSIONS: Height-based determination of dosage of azithromycin in trachoma control programs appears to be feasible, using the height-based schedule proposed. One model was adequate for all the countries in the study. Further expansion to other countries is warranted.
Authors: A Hall; C Nokes; S T Wen; S Adjei; C Kihamia; L Mwanri; E Bobrow; J de Graft-Johnson; D Bundy Journal: Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg Date: 1999 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 2.184
Authors: A W Solomon; J Akudibillah; P Abugri; M Hagan; A Foster; R L Bailey; D C Mabey Journal: Bull World Health Organ Date: 2003-11-05 Impact factor: 9.408
Authors: J Schachter; S K West; D Mabey; C R Dawson; L Bobo; R Bailey; S Vitale; T C Quinn; A Sheta; S Sallam; H Mkocha; D Mabey; H Faal Journal: Lancet Date: 1999-08-21 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Bruce D Gaynor; Abdou Amza; Boubacar Kadri; Baido Nassirou; Ousmane Lawan; Laouali Maman; Nicole E Stoller; Sun N Yu; Stephanie A Chin; Sheila K West; Robin L Bailey; Philip J Rosenthal; Jeremy D Keenan; Travis C Porco; Thomas M Lietman Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2014-03-10 Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: Anthony W Solomon; Matthew J Burton; Emily W Gower; Emma M Harding-Esch; Catherine E Oldenburg; Hugh R Taylor; Lamine Traoré Journal: Nat Rev Dis Primers Date: 2022-05-26 Impact factor: 52.329
Authors: Emily S West; Beatriz Munoz; Harran Mkocha; Martin J Holland; Aura Aguirre; Anthony W Solomon; Robin Bailey; Allen Foster; David Mabey; Sheila K West Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Victor H Hu; Emma M Harding-Esch; Matthew J Burton; Robin L Bailey; Julbert Kadimpeul; David C W Mabey Journal: Trop Med Int Health Date: 2010-04-04 Impact factor: 2.622
Authors: Ali Sié; Boubacar Coulibaly; Clarisse Dah; Mamadou Bountogo; Mamadou Ouattara; Guillaume Compaoré; Jessica M Brogdon; William W Godwin; Elodie Lebas; Thuy Doan; Benjamin F Arnold; Travis C Porco; Thomas M Lietman; Catherine E Oldenburg Journal: BMC Pediatr Date: 2021-03-17 Impact factor: 2.125
Authors: Tansy Edwards; Elizabeth Allen; Emma M Harding-Esch; John Hart; Sarah E Burr; Martin J Holland; Ansumana Sillah; Sheila K West; David Mabey; Robin Bailey Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis Date: 2014-08-28
Authors: Kieran S O'Brien; Sun Y Cotter; Abdou Amza; Boubacar Kadri; Baido Nassirou; Nicole E Stoller; Zhaoxia Zhou; Chris Cotter; Sheila K West; Robin L Bailey; Philip J Rosenthal; Bruce D Gaynor; Travis C Porco; Thomas M Lietman Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2017-07-19 Impact factor: 2.345