Literature DB >> 12656298

The complexities of complex span: explaining individual differences in working memory in children and adults.

Donna M Bayliss1, Christopher Jarrold, Deborah M Gunn, Alan D Baddeley.   

Abstract

Two studies are presented that investigated the constraints underlying working memory performance in children and adults. In each case, independent measures of processing efficiency and storage capacity are assessed to determine their relative importance in predicting performance on complex span tasks,which measure working memory capacity. Results show that complex span performance was independently constrained by individual differences in domain-general processing efficiency and domain-specific storage capacity. Residual variance, which may reflect the ability to coordinate storage and processing, also predicted academic achievement. These results challenge the view that complex span taps a limited-capacity resource pool shared between processing and storage operations. Rather, they are consistent with a multiple-component model in which separate resource pools support the processing and storage functions of working memory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12656298     DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.132.1.71

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  46 in total

Review 1.  Modeling working memory: an interference model of complex span.

Authors:  Klaus Oberauer; Stephan Lewandowsky; Simon Farrell; Christopher Jarrold; Martin Greaves
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-10

2.  On the capacity of attention: its estimation and its role in working memory and cognitive aptitudes.

Authors:  Nelson Cowan; Emily M Elliott; J Scott Saults; Candice C Morey; Sam Mattox; Anna Hismjatullina; Andrew R A Conway
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2005-03-02       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Complex span tasks, simple span tasks, and cognitive abilities: a reanalysis of key studies.

Authors:  Roberto Colom; Irene Rebollo; Francisco J Abad; Pei Chun Shih
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-01

4.  Interference between storage and processing in working memory: Feature overwriting, not similarity-based competition.

Authors:  Klaus Oberauer
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-04

5.  Age-related features of the interaction of learning success and characteristics of auditory operative memory.

Authors:  E S Dmitrieva; V Ya Gel'man; K A Zaitseva; S V Lan'ko
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2008-05

6.  Head Cooling Prior to Exercise in the Heat Does Not Improve Cognitive Performance.

Authors:  Nur Shakila Mazalan; Grant Justin Landers; Karen Elizabeth Wallman; Ullrich Ecker
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 2.988

7.  Behavioral and Neural Signatures of Working Memory in Childhood.

Authors:  Monica D Rosenberg; Steven A Martinez; Kristina M Rapuano; May I Conley; Alexandra O Cohen; M Daniela Cornejo; Donald J Hagler; Wesley J Meredith; Kevin M Anderson; Tor D Wager; Eric Feczko; Eric Earl; Damien A Fair; Deanna M Barch; Richard Watts; B J Casey
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  The Role of Covert Retrieval in Working Memory Span Tasks: Evidence from Delayed Recall Tests.

Authors:  David P McCabe
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.059

9.  Task experience and children's working memory performance: a perspective from recall timing.

Authors:  John N Towse; Nelson Cowan; Neil J Horton; Shealagh Whytock
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2008-05

10.  Inhibition control and working memory capacity in children with SLI.

Authors:  Klara Marton; Lyudmyla Kelmenson; Milana Pinkhasova
Journal:  Psikhologyah       Date:  2007
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.