Literature DB >> 12655788

Evaluation of the morphology of submucosal tumor invasion and its volume in early gastric cancer.

Hiroyuki Matsuzaki1, Shiro Kikuchi, Akira Kakita.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the clinical importance of the morphology of submucosal tumor invasion and its volume in early gastric cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The subjects were 92 patients with a single lesion of early gastric cancer, who underwent gastrectomy with dissection of lymph nodes, and in whom the lesion was histologically-diagnosed as early gastric cancer with submucosal invasion. The volume of lesions (Vsm, S: < 50 mm3, L: > = 50 mm3) was determined by reconstructing submucosal lesions by the surface rendering method using pathological tissue sections (mean, 3.6 sections/lesion). The relationships between the volume of lesions and lymph node metastasis and between conventional clinicopathological parameters and lymph node metastasis were evaluated.
RESULTS: Lymph node metastasis was observed in 18 patients (20%). The depth of submucosal invasion was 1.7 +/- 1.4 mm (mean +/- S.D.; range, 0.2-7.5 mm). sm1 (depth of submucosal tumor invasion < 0.5 mm) was observed in 11 patients (12%), and sm2 (depth of submucosal tumor invasion > = 0.5 mm) in 81 patients (88%). The mean Vsm was 104.1 +/- 215.4 mm3 (0.4-1,730.5 mm3). Fifty-seven patients (62.0%) were in group S, and 35 patients (38.0%) in group L. There was a significant difference between lymph node metastasis and Vsm (S vs. L) alone (p = 0.006). Logistic regression analysis also demonstrated that Vsm alone was correlated with lymph node metastasis (p = 0.005; odds ratio, 1.27; 95% confidence interval, 0.074-0.401).
CONCLUSION: The volume of submucosal lesions in early gastric cancer is important for evaluating lymph node metastasis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12655788

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  In Vivo        ISSN: 0258-851X            Impact factor:   2.155


  6 in total

1.  CT volumetry can potentially predict the local stage for gastric cancer after chemotherapy.

Authors:  Zhi Cong Wang; Chen Wang; Ying Ding; Yuan Ji; Meng Su Zeng; Sheng Xiang Rao
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2017 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.630

2.  Impact of immunohistochemically identified lymphatic invasion on nodal metastasis in early gastric cancer.

Authors:  Akihiro Sako; Joji Kitayama; Makoto Ishikawa; Hiroharu Yamashita; Hirokazu Nagawa
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2006-11-24       Impact factor: 7.370

Review 3.  Predicting lymph node status in early gastric cancer.

Authors:  Robert Michael Kwee; Thomas Christian Kwee
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 7.370

4.  Histopathological predictor for regional lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Hiroshi Morita; Yukio Ishikawa; Yuri Akishima-Fukasawa; Kinji Ito; Yoshikiyo Akasaka; Chiaki Nishimura; Yoshinori Igarashi; Kazumasa Miki; Toshiharu Ishii
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2008-12-23       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 5.  Prediction of lymph node metastasis and sentinel node navigation surgery for patients with early-stage gastric cancer.

Authors:  Atsuo Shida; Norio Mitsumori; Hiroshi Nimura; Yuta Takano; Taizou Iwasaki; Muneharu Fujisaki; Naoto Takahashi; Katsuhiko Yanaga
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  The longest diameter of tumor as a parameter of endoscopic resection in early gastric cancer: In comparison with tumor area.

Authors:  Yoo Jin Um; Hae Won Kim; Da Hyun Jung; Jie-Hyun Kim; Jae Jun Park; Young Hoon Youn; Hyojin Park; Jong Won Kim; Seung Ho Choi; Sung Hoon Noh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.