Literature DB >> 12655533

Correlation between HER-2 expression and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide in patients with breast carcinoma.

Fan Zhang1, Ying Yang, Terry Smith, Shu-Wan Kau, Judy M McConathy, Francisco J Esteva, Henry M Kuerer, W Fraser Symmans, Aman U Buzdar, Gabriel N Hortobagyi, Lajos Pusztai.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to determine whether HER-2 overexpression is associated with improved response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide (FAC) in patients with breast carcinoma.
METHODS: Ninety-seven patients with Stage I-III breast carcinoma were included. HER-2 expression was determined by routine clinical laboratory assessment, and tumors with 3 + immunohistochemistry staining intensity or gene amplification by fluorescent in situ hybridization were considered HER-2 positive. Response was assessed by physical examination, imaging assessment, and pathologic assessment at the time of surgery.
RESULTS: The median patient age was 45 years. At baseline, 68% of patients had lymph node positive disease, 87% had >/= T2 tumors, and 28% of patients had HER-2 positive tumors. Eighty-four percent of patients received four courses of FAC, 8% of patients received 3 courses of FAC, and the remaining 8% of patients received 5-6 courses of FAC. The clinical response rate (complete response [CR] and partial response [PR]) was 78%, the imaging response rate (CR and PR) was 64%, and 15% of patients had a good pathologic response, defined as a CR or minimal residual disease (tumor measuring < 1 cm in greatest dimension and negative lymph nodes). Concordance between the three methods of response assessment (clinical, pathologic, and imaging) was modest and was best between clinical assessment and imaging assessment (64% concordance). HER-2 status did not correlate with pathologic or clinical response (assessed by physical examination or imaging), although a nonsignificant trend was noted toward better response in patients with breast tumors that overexpressed HER-2.
CONCLUSIONS: The authors found no significant correlation between HER-2 expression and clinical or pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast carcinoma. Copyright 2003 American Cancer Society.DOI 10.1002/cncr.11245

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12655533     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.11245

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  17 in total

Review 1.  Molecular biology of breast cancer.

Authors:  Miguel Martín
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.405

2.  Clinical and pathological predictors of the response to neoadjuvant anthracycline chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  Mónica Fernández-Sánchez; Armando Gamboa-Dominguez; Norma Uribe; Ana Cristina García-Ulloa; Diana Flores-Estrada; Myrna Candelaria; Oscar Arrieta
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.064

3.  Utility of DNA postreplication repair protein Rad6B in neoadjuvant chemotherapy response.

Authors:  Malathy P V Shekhar; Laura A Biernat; Nat Pernick; Larry Tait; Judith Abrams; Daniel W Visscher
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2009-05-23       Impact factor: 3.064

4.  Stability of the HER2 gene after primary chemotherapy in advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  Zsuzsanna Varga; Rosmarie Caduff; Bernhard Pestalozzi
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2005-01-14       Impact factor: 4.064

5.  Analysis of functional germline polymorphisms for prediction of response to anthracycline-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.

Authors:  Joanna Szkandera; Gudrun Absenger; Nadia Dandachi; Peter Regitnig; Sigurd Lax; Michael Stotz; Hellmut Samonigg; Wilfried Renner; Armin Gerger
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2012-08-18       Impact factor: 3.291

6.  Androgen receptor status predicts response to chemotherapy, not risk of breast cancer in Indian women.

Authors:  Pranjal Kulshreshtha; Anurupa Chakraborty; Lc Singh; Ashwani K Mishra; Dinesh Bhatnagar; Sunita Saxena
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 2.754

7.  The epidermal growth factor receptor family in breast cancer.

Authors:  Angelos K Koutras; T R Jeffry Evans
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2008-09-01       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Associations between ERBB2 amplification and progression-free survival and overall survival in advanced stage, suboptimally-resected epithelial ovarian cancers: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study.

Authors:  John Farley; Sartoru Fuchiuji; Kathleen M Darcy; Chunqiao Tian; William J Hoskins; William P McGuire; Parviz Hanjani; David Warshal; Benjamin E Greer; Jerome Belinson; Michael J Birrer
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2009-03-09       Impact factor: 5.482

9.  HER-2, TOP2A and chromosome 17 alterations in breast cancer.

Authors:  Asli Rehber Beser; Sitki Tuzlali; Deniz Guzey; Semra Dolek Guler; Seniha Hacihanefioglu; Nejat Dalay
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2007-10-07       Impact factor: 3.201

Review 10.  A literature review of molecular markers predictive of clinical response to cytotoxic chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Ikuo Sekine; Chikako Shimizu; Kazuto Nishio; Nagahiro Saijo; Tomohide Tamura
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-04-24       Impact factor: 3.402

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.