Literature DB >> 12655521

Can patient selection for bladder preservation be based on response to chemotherapy?

Cora N Sternberg1, Vito Pansadoro, Fabio Calabrò, Sylvia Schnetzer, Diana Giannarelli, Paolo Emiliozzi, Francesco De Paula, Paolo Scarpone, Piero De Carli, Maurizio Pizzo, Andrea Platania, Mostafà Amini.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with muscle-invasive bladder carcinoma is given to treat micrometastases and to preserve the bladder. The objective of this study was to evaluate the possibility of bladder preservation in patients with muscle-invasive bladder carcinoma who were treated with neoadjuvant methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (M-VAC) chemotherapy.
METHODS: One hundred four consecutive patients with T2-T4,N0,M0 transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder were treated with 3 cycles of neoadjuvant M-VAC chemotherapy. After clinical restaging, 52 patients underwent transurethral resection of the bladder (TURB) alone, 13 patients underwent partial cystectomy, and 39 patients underwent radical cystectomy.
RESULTS: The median survival for the entire group was 7.49 years (95% confidence interval, 4.86-10.0 years). Forty-nine patients (49%) were T0 at the time of TURB after receiving M-VAC. Thirty-one of 52 patients (60%) who received chemotherapy and underwent TURB alone were alive at a median follow-up of 56 + months (range, 10-160 + months): Twenty-three patients (44%) in that TURB group maintained an intact bladder. Of 13 responding patients with monofocal lesions who underwent partial cystectomy, only 1 patient required salvage cystectomy, and survival generally was good. The 5-year survival rate for this group was 69%. With a long median follow-up of 88 + months (range, 16-158 months), 4 patients (31%) were alive with a functioning bladder. In the radical cystectomy group, the median follow-up was 45 months (range, 4-172 + months), and 15 of 39 patients (38%) patients remained alive. In 77 patients who had their tumors down-staged to T0 or superficial disease, the median follow-up was 63 months (range, 4-172 + months), and the 5-year rate survival was 69%. This is in contrast to a 5-year survival rate of only 26% in 27 patients who failed to respond and had a status >/= T2 after receiving chemotherapy (median follow-up, 31 months; range, 7-156 + months). The median survival for 27 elderly patients (age >/= 70 years; median age, 73 years; range, 70-82 years) was 90 months (7.5 years). For elderly patients who underwent TURB and partial cystectomy, the 5-year survival rate was 67% with a 109-month (9-year) median survival; 47% of patients preserved their bladders intact. The median follow-up of the living elderly patients was 61 months (range, 20-120 + months).
CONCLUSIONS: Bladder sparing in selected patients on the basis of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy is a feasible approach that should be confirmed in prospective, randomized trials. Selected elderly patients are candidates for this approach. Copyright 2003 American Cancer Society.DOI 10.1002/cncr.11232

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12655521     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.11232

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  36 in total

Review 1.  Current management of muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  G Sancho; P Maroto; J Palou
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 2.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for bladder cancer.

Authors:  Peter C Black; Gordon A Brown; H Barton Grossman; Colin P Dinney
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Editorial comment.

Authors:  Michele Pavone-Macaluso
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.370

4.  Comparing RECIST with EORTC criteria in metastatic bladder cancer.

Authors:  Hakan Öztürk
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-07-25       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 5.  Urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: definition, treatment and future efforts.

Authors:  Sandip M Prasad; G Joel Decastro; Gary D Steinberg
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 14.432

6.  Recurrent bladder carcinoma: clinical and prognostic role of 18 F-FDG PET/CT.

Authors:  Pierpaolo Alongi; Federico Caobelli; Roberta Gentile; Alessandro Stefano; Giorgio Russo; Domenico Albano; Sergio Baldari; Maria Carla Gilardi; Massimo Midiri
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  The influence of post-diuretic late phase imaging in visual and quantitative evaluation of urothelial tumors by F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography.

Authors:  Zehra Pınar Koç; Pelin Özcan Kara; Emel Sezer; Kadir Eser
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2019-12-01

8.  [Pharmacological therapy of urogenital cancer: rational routine diagnostic imaging].

Authors:  A Heidenreich; S Krege
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 0.639

9.  [Neoadjuvant, inductive or adjuvant chemotherapy of bladder cancer].

Authors:  C-H Ohlmann; M De Santis
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 10.  Practical use of perioperative chemotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: summary of session at the Society of Urologic Oncology annual meeting.

Authors:  Andrea B Apolo; Herbert Barton Grossman; Dean Bajorin; Gary Steinberg; Ashish M Kamat
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.498

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.