Literature DB >> 12654435

Treatment results of high-dose-rate remote afterloading brachytherapy for cervical cancer and retrospective comparison of two regimens.

Frank C S Wong1, Stewart Y Tung, To-Wai Leung, Wing-Kin Sze, Victy Y W Wong, Collin M M Lui, Kwok-Keung Yuen, Sai-Ki O.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To review the treatment results and complications of high-dose-rate (HDR) intracavitary brachytherapy for patients with carcinoma of the cervix in a single institute and to compare them with those of low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy reported in the literature. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Two hundred twenty patients with carcinoma of the cervix were treated by primary radiotherapy between 1991 and 1998. The median age was 63 (range 24-84). The distribution according to Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system was as follows: Stage IB, 11.4%; IIA, 9.1%; IIB, 50.9%; IIIA, 3.6%; IIIB, 23.2%; and IVA, 1.8%. They were treated with whole pelvic irradiation giving 40 Gy to the midplane in 20 fractions over 4 weeks. This was followed by parametrial irradiation, giving 16-20 Gy in 8-10 fractions. HDR intracavitary brachytherapy was given weekly, with a dose of 7 Gy to point A for three fractions and, starting from 1996, 6 Gy weekly for four fractions. The median overall treatment time was 50 days (range 42-73 days). The median follow-up time was 4.7 years (range 3 months to 11.1 years). Multivariate analysis was performed using the Cox regression proportional hazards model.
RESULTS: The complete remission rate after radiotherapy was 93.4% (211/226). The 5-year actuarial failure-free survival (FFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) rates for stage IB, IIA, IIB, IIIA, IIIB, and IVA were 87.7% and 86.6%, 85% and 85%, 67.8% and 74%, 46.9% and 54.7%, 44.8% and 50.4%, 0% and 25%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, young age (< 50) (p = 0.0054), adenocarcinoma (p = 0.0384), and stage (p = 0.0005) were found to be independent poor prognostic factors. The 5-year actuarial major complication rates (Grade 3 or above) were as follows: proctitis, 1.0%; cystitis, 0.5%; enteritis, 1.3%; and overall, 2.8%. On multivariate analysis, history of pelvic surgery was a significant prognosticator. The two HDR fractionation schedules were not a significant prognosticator in predicting disease control and complications.
CONCLUSION: Our experience in treating cervical cancer with HDR intracavitary brachytherapy is encouraging. Our treatment results and complication rates were compatible with those of the LDR series. Further studies are eagerly awaited to better define the optimal fractionation schedule for HDR brachytherapy and the schedule on how chemotherapy may be combined with it.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12654435     DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(02)04525-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  11 in total

Review 1.  Radiotherapy and wound healing.

Authors:  Emma-Louise Dormand; Paul E Banwell; Timothy E E Goodacre
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  Evaluation of the response of concurrent high dose rate intracavitary brachytherapy with external beam radiotherapy in management of early stage carcinoma cervix.

Authors:  Arvind Kumar Patidar; H S Kumar; Rahul V Walke; Pushpendra H Hirapara; Shankar Lal Jakhar; M R Bardia
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2012-08-17

Review 3.  American Brachytherapy Task Group Report: A pooled analysis of clinical outcomes for high-dose-rate brachytherapy for cervical cancer.

Authors:  Jyoti Mayadev; Akila Viswanathan; Yu Liu; Chin-Shang Li; Kevin Albuquerque; Antonio L Damato; Sushil Beriwal; Beth Erickson
Journal:  Brachytherapy       Date:  2017 Jan - Feb       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 4.  External beam techniques to boost cervical cancer when brachytherapy is not an option-theories and applications.

Authors:  Omar Mahmoud; Sarah Kilic; Atif J Khan; Sushil Beriwal; William Small
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-05

5.  Treatment outcomes of patients with FIGO Stage I/II uterine cervical cancer treated with definitive radiotherapy: a multi-institutional retrospective research study.

Authors:  Takuro Ariga; Takafumi Toita; Shingo Kato; Tomoko Kazumoto; Masaki Kubozono; Sunao Tokumaru; Hidehiro Eto; Tetsuo Nishimura; Yuzuru Niibe; Kensei Nakata; Yuko Kaneyasu; Takeshi Nonoshita; Takashi Uno; Tatsuya Ohno; Hiromitsu Iwata; Yoko Harima; Hitoshi Wada; Kenji Yoshida; Hiromichi Gomi; Hodaka Numasaki; Teruki Teshima; Shogo Yamada; Takashi Nakano
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 2.724

6.  Dosimetric comparison and observation of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Rongqiang Pan; Jingming Wang; Feng Qi; Ruizhen Liu
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-08-08       Impact factor: 2.967

7.  Aurora-A affects radiosenstivity in cervical squamous cell carcinoma and predicts poor prognosis.

Authors:  Yuhua Ma; Jie Yang; Ruozheng Wang; Zegao Zhang; Xiaoli Qi; Chunhua Liu; Miaomiao Ma
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-05-09

8.  A prospective randomized study on two dose fractionation regimens of high-dose-rate brachytherapy for carcinoma of the uterine cervix: comparison of efficacies and toxicities between two regimens.

Authors:  Taek Keun Nam; Sung Ja Ahn
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.153

9.  Effectiveness of two different HDR brachytherapy regimens with the same BED value in cervical cancer.

Authors:  Kamlesh Passi; Than S Kehwar; Meenakshi Mittal; Bikramjit Singh; Rajesh Vashistha; Sureshchandra J Gupta; J V Yakhmi
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2010-07-06

Review 10.  High dose rate versus low dose rate intracavity brachytherapy for locally advanced uterine cervix cancer.

Authors:  Ruifeng Liu; XiaoHu Wang; Jin Hui Tian; KeHu Yang; Jun Wang; Lei Jiang; Xiang Yong Hao
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-10-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.