Literature DB >> 12654430

Radiation-induced DNA damage and repair in lymphocytes from breast cancer patients and their correlation with acute skin reactions to radiotherapy.

Odilia Popanda1, Reinhard Ebbeler, Dorothee Twardella, Irmgard Helmbold, Florian Gotzes, Peter Schmezer, Heinz Walter Thielmann, Dietrich von Fournier, Wulf Haase, Marie Luise Sautter-Bihl, Frederik Wenz, Helmut Bartsch, Jenny Chang-Claude.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Repair of radiation-induced DNA damage plays a critical role for both the susceptibility of patients to side effects after radiotherapy and their subsequent cancer risk. The study objective was to evaluate whether DNA repair data determined in vitro are correlated with the occurrence of acute side effects during radiotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Breast cancer patients receiving radiation therapy after a breast-conserving surgery were recruited in a prospective epidemiologic study. As an indicator for clinical radiosensitivity, adverse reactions of the skin were recorded. Cryo-preserved lymphocytes from 113 study participants were gamma-irradiated with 5 Gy in vitro and analyzed using the alkaline comet assay. Reproducibility of the assay was determined by repeated analysis (n = 26) of cells from a healthy donor. A coefficient of variation of 0.3 was calculated.
RESULTS: The various parameters determined to characterize the individual DNA repair capacity showed large differences between patients. Eleven patients were identified with considerably enhanced DNA damage induction, and 7 patients exhibited severely reduced DNA repair capacity after 15 and 30 min. Six patients were considered as clinically radiosensitive, indicated by moist desquamation of the skin after a total radiation dose of about 50 Gy.
CONCLUSIONS: Using the alkaline comet assay as described here, breast cancer patients were identified showing abnormal cellular radiation effects, but this repair deficiency corresponded only at a very limited extent to the acute radiation sensitivity of the skin. Because impaired DNA repair could be involved in the development of late irradiation effects, individuals exhibiting severely reduced DNA repair capacity should be followed for the development of late clinical symptoms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12654430     DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(02)04415-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  22 in total

1.  Hydrogel discs for digital microfluidics.

Authors:  Lindsey K Fiddes; Vivienne N Luk; Sam H Au; Alphonsus H C Ng; Victoria Luk; Eugenia Kumacheva; Aaron R Wheeler
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 2.800

2.  Podophyllum hexandrum modulates gamma radiation-induced immunosuppression in Balb/c mice: implications in radioprotection.

Authors:  H C Goel; H Prakash; A Ali; M Bala
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2006-10-07       Impact factor: 3.396

Review 3.  [Prediction of the reaction of normal tissue and tumor cells to radiotherapy].

Authors:  E Dikomey; J Dahm-Daphi; L Distel
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 4.  Genetic and epigenetic features in radiation sensitivity Part I: cell signalling in radiation response.

Authors:  Michel H Bourguignon; Pablo A Gisone; Maria R Perez; Severino Michelin; Diana Dubner; Marina Di Giorgio; Edgardo D Carosella
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 5.  Markers of oxidant stress that are clinically relevant in aging and age-related disease.

Authors:  Kimberly D Jacob; Nicole Noren Hooten; Andrzej R Trzeciak; Michele K Evans
Journal:  Mech Ageing Dev       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 5.432

6.  A modified alkaline comet assay for measuring DNA repair capacity in human populations.

Authors:  Andrzej R Trzeciak; Janice Barnes; Michele K Evans
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 7.  Biologically conformal treatment: biomarkers and functional imaging in radiation oncology.

Authors:  Yaacov Richard Lawrence; Maria Werner-Wasik; Adam P Dicker
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.404

8.  Age, sex, and race influence single-strand break repair capacity in a human population.

Authors:  Andrzej R Trzeciak; Janice Barnes; Ngozi Ejiogu; Kamala Foster; Larry J Brant; Alan B Zonderman; Michele K Evans
Journal:  Free Radic Biol Med       Date:  2008-09-17       Impact factor: 7.376

9.  4D blood flow model for dose calculation to circulating blood and lymphocytes.

Authors:  Abdelkhalek Hammi; Harald Paganetti; Clemens Grassberger
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Evaluation of different biomarkers to predict individual radiosensitivity in an inter-laboratory comparison--lessons for future studies.

Authors:  Burkhard Greve; Tobias Bölling; Susanne Amler; Ute Rössler; Maria Gomolka; Claudia Mayer; Odilia Popanda; Kristin Dreffke; Astrid Rickinger; Eberhard Fritz; Friederike Eckardt-Schupp; Christina Sauerland; Herbert Braselmann; Wiebke Sauter; Thomas Illig; Dorothea Riesenbeck; Stefan Könemann; Normann Willich; Simone Mörtl; Hans Theodor Eich; Peter Schmezer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.