Literature DB >> 12654277

Learning through public involvement in environmental assessment hearings.

Patricia Fitzpatrick1, A John Sinclair.   

Abstract

This research examined the opportunities for critical education available to participants of a federal environmental assessment (EA) that includes hearings. The Sable Gas Panel Review, an assessment of a natural gas project situated in the Maritimes, was undertaken between 1996 and 1997. This study documented what participants learned through their experiences and how that learning was facilitated. Primary data collection emphasized the use of semi-structured interviews to record the experientially based observations of panel participants. Primary data were supported by a review of material submitted by hearing participants for consideration by the panel, and complemented with literature related to EA, environmental education, and transformational learning theories. Evidence was considered in terms of assessment-specific operational definitions, developed from Shor (1993) [Education is politics: Paulo Freire's Critical Pedagogy. In: McLaren, P., Leonard, P. (Eds.), Paulo Freire : A critical Encounter, Routledge, New York, pp. 25-35] ten indicators of critical education. The study revealed that participants of the Sable Gas panel review had an opportunity to engage in critical education. While it is important to acknowledge that the panel did not set out to engage participants in a 'critical educational' experience, each of the 10 operational definitions of critical education used in the study were addressed to varying degrees through activities undertaken by the panel secretariat. Results illustrate the types of educational opportunities, such as a class on how to participate in a quasi-judicial hearing, and the importance of participant-led research that can arise out of the panel review process. The findings of this research contribute to the evolving literature regarding the role of critical education in EA and environmental management. Understanding the existing scope of critical education within a panel review provides the foundation for identifying opportunities for expanding the capacity of the existing EA process to facilitate learning by participants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12654277     DOI: 10.1016/s0301-4797(02)00204-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Manage        ISSN: 0301-4797            Impact factor:   6.789


  3 in total

1.  The contribution of environmental assessment to sustainable development: toward a richer empirical understanding.

Authors:  Matthew Cashmore; Alan Bond; Dick Cobb
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2007-06-04       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Environmental impact assessment (EIA): an overlooked instrument for sustainable development in Pakistan.

Authors:  Rashid Saeed; Ayesha Sattar; Zafar Iqbal; Muhammad Imran; Raziya Nadeem
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2011-09-02       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Environmental impact assessment under the Mackenzie Valley Resource Management Act: deliberative democracy in Canada's North?

Authors:  Patricia Fitzpatrick; A John Sinclair; Bruce Mitchell
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2008-03-27       Impact factor: 3.266

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.