Ronald E Domen1, Gerald A Hoeltge. 1. Cleveland Clinic, Department of Clinical Pathology, Section of Transfusion Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA. rdomen@psu.edu
Abstract
CONTEXT: Allergic reaction to transfusion is common. However, the review of a large series of allergic transfusion reactions has not been performed. OBJECTIVE: To review a large series of allergic transfusion reactions. DESIGN: A retrospective review of all reported and evaluated transfusion reactions during a 9-year period at 1 institution was performed. Associated clinical signs and symptoms were evaluated. SETTING: Large, tertiary-care teaching hospital. RESULTS: A total of 1613 adverse reactions to transfusion were evaluated. Allergic transfusion reactions accounted for 17% (273 of 1613) of the transfusion reactions. Severe allergic reactions (anaphylaxis, anaphylactoid signs and symptoms, and/or hypotension) were observed in 21 patients (7.7% of allergic reactions, or 1.3% of all transfusion reactions). Serum tryptase, a marker for anaphylaxis, was measured in 1 patient and determined to be borderline elevated. Five patients experienced allergic transfusion reactions to autologous red cell transfusions. One patient experienced hives during the transfusion of a major ABO mismatched red blood cell. A wide variety of skin manifestations were observed, but 26 (9.5%) patients did not have skin manifestations. Allergic transfusion reactions were estimated to occur in approximately 1 in 4124 blood components transfused, or 1 in 2338 transfusion episodes. Severe allergic reactions occurred in approximately 1 in 30,281 transfusions. No deaths directly attributable to transfusion were observed in this patient group. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical presentation of allergic transfusion reactions was quite variable, and the pathophysiology remains unclear. Recommendations for clinical evaluation and therapy remain problematic and often empirical.
CONTEXT: Allergic reaction to transfusion is common. However, the review of a large series of allergic transfusion reactions has not been performed. OBJECTIVE: To review a large series of allergic transfusion reactions. DESIGN: A retrospective review of all reported and evaluated transfusion reactions during a 9-year period at 1 institution was performed. Associated clinical signs and symptoms were evaluated. SETTING: Large, tertiary-care teaching hospital. RESULTS: A total of 1613 adverse reactions to transfusion were evaluated. Allergic transfusion reactions accounted for 17% (273 of 1613) of the transfusion reactions. Severe allergic reactions (anaphylaxis, anaphylactoid signs and symptoms, and/or hypotension) were observed in 21 patients (7.7% of allergic reactions, or 1.3% of all transfusion reactions). Serum tryptase, a marker for anaphylaxis, was measured in 1 patient and determined to be borderline elevated. Five patients experienced allergic transfusion reactions to autologous red cell transfusions. One patient experienced hives during the transfusion of a major ABO mismatched red blood cell. A wide variety of skin manifestations were observed, but 26 (9.5%) patients did not have skin manifestations. Allergic transfusion reactions were estimated to occur in approximately 1 in 4124 blood components transfused, or 1 in 2338 transfusion episodes. Severe allergic reactions occurred in approximately 1 in 30,281 transfusions. No deaths directly attributable to transfusion were observed in this patient group. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical presentation of allergic transfusion reactions was quite variable, and the pathophysiology remains unclear. Recommendations for clinical evaluation and therapy remain problematic and often empirical.
Authors: Jessica Q Zhou; Elizabeth Choe; Lawrence Ang; Ingela Schnittger; Stanley G Rockson; Jennifer A Tremmel; Francois Haddad Journal: Exp Clin Cardiol Date: 2011
Authors: William J Savage; Aaron A R Tobian; Jessica H Savage; Robert A Wood; John T Schroeder; Paul M Ness Journal: Transfusion Date: 2012-09-24 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: William J Savage; Aaron A R Tobian; Jessica H Savage; Robert G Hamilton; Paul M Ness Journal: Transfusion Date: 2011-05-13 Impact factor: 3.157