BACKGROUND: The risk for allergic reactions depends on the sensitivity of individuals and the quantities of offending food ingested. The sensitivity varies among allergic individuals, as does the threshold dose of a food allergen capable of inducing an allergic reaction. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed at determining the distribution of minimum provoking doses of hazelnut in a hazelnut-allergic population. METHODS:Thirty-one patients with a history of hazelnut-related allergic symptoms, a positive skin prick test to hazelnut and/or an elevated specific IgE level, were included. Double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenges (DBPCFC) were performed with seven increasing doses of dried hazelnut (1 mg to 1 g hazelnut protein) randomly interspersed with seven placebo doses. RESULTS:Twenty-nine patients had a positive challenge. Itching of the oral cavity and/or lips was the first symptom in all cases. Additional gastrointestinal symptoms were reported in five patients and difficulty in swallowing in one patient. Lip swelling was observed in two patients, followed by generalized urticaria in one of these. Threshold doses for eliciting subjective reactions varied from a dose of 1 mg up to 100 mg hazelnut protein (equivalent to 6.4-640 mg hazelnut meal). Extrapolation of the dose-response curve showed that 50% of our hazelnut-allergic population will suffer from an allergic reaction after ingestion of 6 mg (95% CI, 2-11 mg) of hazelnut protein. Objective symptoms were observed in two patients after 1 and 1,000 mg, respectively. CONCLUSION:DBPCFCs demonstrated threshold doses in half of the hazelnut-allergic patients similar to doses previously described to be hidden in consumer products. This stresses the need for careful labelling and strategies to prevent and detect contamination of food products with hazelnut residues.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: The risk for allergic reactions depends on the sensitivity of individuals and the quantities of offending food ingested. The sensitivity varies among allergic individuals, as does the threshold dose of a food allergen capable of inducing an allergic reaction. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed at determining the distribution of minimum provoking doses of hazelnut in a hazelnut-allergic population. METHODS: Thirty-one patients with a history of hazelnut-related allergic symptoms, a positive skin prick test to hazelnut and/or an elevated specific IgE level, were included. Double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenges (DBPCFC) were performed with seven increasing doses of dried hazelnut (1 mg to 1 g hazelnut protein) randomly interspersed with seven placebo doses. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients had a positive challenge. Itching of the oral cavity and/or lips was the first symptom in all cases. Additional gastrointestinal symptoms were reported in five patients and difficulty in swallowing in one patient. Lip swelling was observed in two patients, followed by generalized urticaria in one of these. Threshold doses for eliciting subjective reactions varied from a dose of 1 mg up to 100 mg hazelnut protein (equivalent to 6.4-640 mg hazelnut meal). Extrapolation of the dose-response curve showed that 50% of our hazelnut-allergic population will suffer from an allergic reaction after ingestion of 6 mg (95% CI, 2-11 mg) of hazelnut protein. Objective symptoms were observed in two patients after 1 and 1,000 mg, respectively. CONCLUSION: DBPCFCs demonstrated threshold doses in half of the hazelnut-allergicpatients similar to doses previously described to be hidden in consumer products. This stresses the need for careful labelling and strategies to prevent and detect contamination of food products with hazelnut residues.
Authors: Elena López; Carmen Cuadrado; Carmen Burbano; Maria Aranzazu Jiménez; Julia Rodríguez; Jesús F Crespo Journal: J Clin Bioinforma Date: 2012-05-22
Authors: Juan Peng; Shanshan Song; Liguang Xu; Wei Ma; Liqiang Liu; Hua Kuang; Chuanlai Xu Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2013-07-12 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Laurian Zuidmeer-Jongejan; Montserrat Fernández-Rivas; Marcel Gt Winter; Jaap H Akkerdaas; Colin Summers; Ans Lebens; André C Knulst; Piet Schilte; Peter Briza; Gabriele Gadermaier; Ronald van Ree Journal: Clin Transl Allergy Date: 2014-02-02 Impact factor: 5.871
Authors: Sayantani Sindher; Andrew J Long; Natasha Purington; Madeleine Chollet; Sara Slatkin; Sandra Andorf; Dana Tupa; Divya Kumar; Margaret A Woch; Katherine L O'Laughlin; Amal Assaad; Jacqueline Pongracic; Jonathan M Spergel; Jonathan Tam; Stephen Tilles; Julie Wang; Stephen J Galli; Kari C Nadeau; R Sharon Chinthrajah Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2018-11-27 Impact factor: 7.561