Literature DB >> 12653168

The range of minimum provoking doses in hazelnut-allergic patients as determined by double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenges.

M Wensing1, A H Penninks, S L Hefle, J H Akkerdaas, R van Ree, S J Koppelman, C A F M Bruijnzeel-Koomen, A C Knulst.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The risk for allergic reactions depends on the sensitivity of individuals and the quantities of offending food ingested. The sensitivity varies among allergic individuals, as does the threshold dose of a food allergen capable of inducing an allergic reaction.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed at determining the distribution of minimum provoking doses of hazelnut in a hazelnut-allergic population.
METHODS: Thirty-one patients with a history of hazelnut-related allergic symptoms, a positive skin prick test to hazelnut and/or an elevated specific IgE level, were included. Double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenges (DBPCFC) were performed with seven increasing doses of dried hazelnut (1 mg to 1 g hazelnut protein) randomly interspersed with seven placebo doses.
RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients had a positive challenge. Itching of the oral cavity and/or lips was the first symptom in all cases. Additional gastrointestinal symptoms were reported in five patients and difficulty in swallowing in one patient. Lip swelling was observed in two patients, followed by generalized urticaria in one of these. Threshold doses for eliciting subjective reactions varied from a dose of 1 mg up to 100 mg hazelnut protein (equivalent to 6.4-640 mg hazelnut meal). Extrapolation of the dose-response curve showed that 50% of our hazelnut-allergic population will suffer from an allergic reaction after ingestion of 6 mg (95% CI, 2-11 mg) of hazelnut protein. Objective symptoms were observed in two patients after 1 and 1,000 mg, respectively.
CONCLUSION: DBPCFCs demonstrated threshold doses in half of the hazelnut-allergic patients similar to doses previously described to be hidden in consumer products. This stresses the need for careful labelling and strategies to prevent and detect contamination of food products with hazelnut residues.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12653168     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2222.2002.01555.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Exp Allergy        ISSN: 0954-7894            Impact factor:   5.018


  6 in total

1.  Effects of autoclaving and high pressure on allergenicity of hazelnut proteins.

Authors:  Elena López; Carmen Cuadrado; Carmen Burbano; Maria Aranzazu Jiménez; Julia Rodríguez; Jesús F Crespo
Journal:  J Clin Bioinforma       Date:  2012-05-22

2.  Development of a monoclonal antibody-based sandwich ELISA for peanut allergen Ara h 1 in food.

Authors:  Juan Peng; Shanshan Song; Liguang Xu; Wei Ma; Liqiang Liu; Hua Kuang; Chuanlai Xu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Oil body-associated hazelnut allergens including oleosins are underrepresented in diagnostic extracts but associated with severe symptoms.

Authors:  Laurian Zuidmeer-Jongejan; Montserrat Fernández-Rivas; Marcel Gt Winter; Jaap H Akkerdaas; Colin Summers; Ans Lebens; André C Knulst; Piet Schilte; Peter Briza; Gabriele Gadermaier; Ronald van Ree
Journal:  Clin Transl Allergy       Date:  2014-02-02       Impact factor: 5.871

4.  Analysis of a Large Standardized Food Challenge Data Set to Determine Predictors of Positive Outcome Across Multiple Allergens.

Authors:  Sayantani Sindher; Andrew J Long; Natasha Purington; Madeleine Chollet; Sara Slatkin; Sandra Andorf; Dana Tupa; Divya Kumar; Margaret A Woch; Katherine L O'Laughlin; Amal Assaad; Jacqueline Pongracic; Jonathan M Spergel; Jonathan Tam; Stephen Tilles; Julie Wang; Stephen J Galli; Kari C Nadeau; R Sharon Chinthrajah
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 7.561

Review 5.  Key issues for the assessment of the allergenic potential of genetically modified foods: breakout group reports.

Authors:  Dori R Germolec; Ian Kimber; Lynn Goldman; MaryJane Selgrade
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 6.  Spiking with recombinant allergens to improve allergen extracts: benefits and limitations for the use in routine diagnostics: Part 19 of the Series Molecular Allergology.

Authors:  Johannes Huss-Marp; Monika Raulf; Thilo Jakob
Journal:  Allergo J Int       Date:  2015-11-07
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.