Literature DB >> 12652554

Power and sample size calculations for generalized regression models with covariate measurement error.

Tor D Tosteson1, Jeffrey S Buzas, Eugene Demidenko, Margaret Karagas.   

Abstract

Covariate measurement error is often a feature of scientific data used for regression modelling. The consequences of such errors include a loss of power of tests of significance for the regression parameters corresponding to the true covariates. Power and sample size calculations that ignore covariate measurement error tend to overestimate power and underestimate the actual sample size required to achieve a desired power. In this paper we derive a novel measurement error corrected power function for generalized linear models using a generalized score test based on quasi-likelihood methods. Our power function is flexible in that it is adaptable to designs with a discrete or continuous scalar covariate (exposure) that can be measured with or without error, allows for additional confounding variables and applies to a broad class of generalized regression and measurement error models. A program is described that provides sample size or power for a continuous exposure with a normal measurement error model and a single normal confounder variable in logistic regression. We demonstrate the improved properties of our power calculations with simulations and numerical studies. An example is given from an ongoing study of cancer and exposure to arsenic as measured by toenail concentrations and tap water samples. Copyright 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12652554     DOI: 10.1002/sim.1388

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  24 in total

1.  A two-stage strategy to accommodate general patterns of confounding in the design of observational studies.

Authors:  Sebastien Haneuse; Jonathan Schildcrout; Daniel Gillen
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 5.899

2.  Social disadvantage and schizophrenia. A combined neighbourhood and individual-level analysis.

Authors:  Marjan Drukker; Lydia Krabbendam; Ger Driessen; Jim van Os
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2006-06-02       Impact factor: 4.328

3.  A multilevel analysis of urban neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage and health in late life.

Authors:  Richard G Wight; Janet R Cummings; Dana Miller-Martinez; Arun S Karlamangla; Teresa E Seeman; Carol S Aneshensel
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 4.634

4.  The self-control consequences of political ideology.

Authors:  Joshua J Clarkson; John R Chambers; Edward R Hirt; Ashley S Otto; Frank R Kardes; Christopher Leone
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-06-22       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Lifetime physical activity and pelvic organ prolapse in middle-aged women.

Authors:  Ingrid E Nygaard; Janet M Shaw; Tyler Bardsley; Marlene J Egger
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 6.  STRATOS guidance document on measurement error and misclassification of variables in observational epidemiology: Part 1-Basic theory and simple methods of adjustment.

Authors:  Ruth H Keogh; Pamela A Shaw; Paul Gustafson; Raymond J Carroll; Veronika Deffner; Kevin W Dodd; Helmut Küchenhoff; Janet A Tooze; Michael P Wallace; Victor Kipnis; Laurence S Freedman
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Lifetime physical activity and female stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Ingrid E Nygaard; Janet M Shaw; Tyler Bardsley; Marlene J Egger
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin d and the incidence of acute viral respiratory tract infections in healthy adults.

Authors:  James R Sabetta; Paolo DePetrillo; Ralph J Cipriani; Joanne Smardin; Lillian A Burns; Marie L Landry
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-06-14       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Genetic predictors of circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin d and risk of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Linda T Hiraki; Conghui Qu; Carolyn M Hutter; John A Baron; Sonja I Berndt; Stéphane Bézieau; Hermann Brenner; Bette J Caan; Graham Casey; Jenny Chang-Claude; Stephen J Chanock; David V Conti; David Duggan; Charles S Fuchs; Steven Gallinger; Edward L Giovannucci; Tabitha A Harrison; Richard B Hayes; Aditi Hazra; Brian Henderson; Michael Hoffmeister; John L Hopper; Thomas J Hudson; Mark A Jenkins; Sébastien Küry; Loic Le Marchand; Mathieu Lemire; Jing Ma; Joann E Manson; Hongmei Nan; Polly A Newcomb; Kimmie Ng; John D Potter; Robert E Schoen; Fredrick R Schumacher; Daniela Seminara; Martha L Slattery; Jean Wactawski-Wende; Emily White; Kana Wu; Brent W Zanke; Peter Kraft; Ulrike Peters; Andrew T Chan
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 4.254

10.  Power/sample size calculations for assessing correlates of risk in clinical efficacy trials.

Authors:  Peter B Gilbert; Holly E Janes; Yunda Huang
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 2.373

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.