| Literature DB >> 12652508 |
Darren L Walters1, Pedro L Sanchez, Maximo Rodriguez-Alemparte, Pedro J Colon-Hernandez, Lisa A Hourigan, Igor F Palacios.
Abstract
Accurate assessment of suspected prosthetic valve dysfunction is critically important as reoperation carries high risk. Noninvasive methods of hemodynamic assessment of patients with both aortic and mitral mechanical valves continue to be frustrated by the interference created by prosthetic material and direct left ventricular puncture may be required for definitive hemodynamic assessment. We report the hemodynamic and angiographic results and outcomes of 38 consecutive patients with double valve replacement who underwent left ventricular puncture as part of evaluation of possible prosthetic dysfunction. These results were compared with those obtained by noninvasive testing. We found noninvasive assessment alone to be unsatisfactory as measurements of regurgitation and stenosis correlated poorly with those obtained by direct left ventricular puncture. Important information that altered patient management was obtained from invasive assessment in 68% of cases with an acceptable rate of complications. Therefore, hemodynamic and angiographic assessment using transthoracic left ventricular puncture should be entertained in patients with mitral and aortic valve replacement presenting with congestive heart failure and suspected prosthesis dysfunction. Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2003 PMID: 12652508 DOI: 10.1002/ccd.10473
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ISSN: 1522-1946 Impact factor: 2.692