Literature DB >> 12652493

Impact of restenosis and disease progression on clinical outcome after multivessel stenting in diabetic patients.

Mohamed Loutfi1, Niall T Mulvihill, Marco Boccalatte, Bruno Farah, Jean Fajadet, Jean Marco.   

Abstract

Clinical outcome after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is significantly worse in diabetic patients in comparison to nondiabetic patients. The subset of diabetic patients in the ARTS trial treated with multivessel stenting had the lowest 1-year event-free survival. We examined our experience of multivessel PCI in diabetics to assess clinical outcome outside clinical trials and to determine if repeat revascularizations are the result of restenosis or the progression of nontreated disease. Between January 2000 and December 2001, we performed multivessel PCI in 99 diabetic patients. Our group was well matched with those in the ARTS trial, with mean age of 69 +/- 8 years, male sex 70%, hypertension 68%, hypercholesterolemia 51%, and mean LV ejection fraction 60%. The mean number of diseased segments treated was 2.8 +/- 0.9 and 56% of the patients had three-vessel disease. There were 2.3 +/- 0.6 stents implanted per patient. Target vessels included the LAD in 90%, LCx in 77%, and the RCA in 87% of cases. The in-hospital MACE rate was 8%, which included eight nonfatal MI but no deaths or repeat revascularizations. After a mean follow-up of 14 +/- 8 months, there were 4 deaths (4%), no further MIs, and 21 (21%) repeat revascularizations (2 CABG; 19 PCI), giving a 1-year event-free survival of 67%. There were 18 repeat revascularizations (2 CABG; 16 PCI) for restenosis, but in 9 of the 18 (50%) patients treatment was also required for progression of disease. Three further patients had PCI for symptomatic disease progression without restenosis. Thus, disease progression contributed to 57% of repeat revascularization procedures. The medium- and longer-term success of multivessel PCI in diabetic patients is limited principally by the need for repeat revascularization. However, it is important to realize that these revascularizations are performed not only for restenosis but also for disease progression in more than 50% of patients. Consequently, even if drug-eluting stent technology can eliminate restenosis, disease progression will continue to impact the clinical outcome of diabetic patients after PCI. Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12652493     DOI: 10.1002/ccd.10455

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1522-1946            Impact factor:   2.692


  9 in total

Review 1.  Anatomy of coronary disease in diabetic patients: an explanation for poorer outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention and potential target for intervention.

Authors:  K P Morgan; A Kapur; K J Beatt
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 2.  Stent restenosis and the use of drug-eluting stents in patients with diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Ian J Sarembock
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.810

3.  Recurrent angina after coronary angioplasty: mechanisms, diagnostic and therapeutic options.

Authors:  Paolo Izzo; Andrea Macchi; Luisa De Gennaro; Antonio Gaglione; Matteo Di Biase; Natale Daniele Brunetti
Journal:  Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care       Date:  2012-06

Review 4.  [When are drug-eluting stents effective? A critical analysis of the presently available data].

Authors:  S Silber
Journal:  Z Kardiol       Date:  2004-09

5.  Long-term type 1 diabetes enhances in-stent restenosis after aortic stenting in diabetes-prone BB rats.

Authors:  Geanina Onuta; Hendrik C Groenewegen; Flip A Klatter; Mark Walther Boer; Maaike Goris; Harry van Goor; Anton J M Roks; Jan Rozing; Bart J G L de Smet; Jan-Luuk Hillebrands
Journal:  J Biomed Biotechnol       Date:  2011-02-09

Review 6.  Is ischemia the only factor predicting cardiovascular outcomes in all diabetes mellitus patients?

Authors:  Mark W Kennedy; Enrico Fabris; Harry Suryapranata; Elvin Kedhi
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diabetol       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 9.951

7.  Successful revascularization versus medical therapy in diabetic patients with stable right coronary artery chronic total occlusion: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Yunfeng Yan; Mingduo Zhang; Fei Yuan; Hong Liu; Di Wu; Yudong Fan; Xinjing Guo; Feng Xu; Min Zhang; Quanming Zhao; Shuzheng Lyu
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diabetol       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 9.951

8.  Variation in the human soluble epoxide hydrolase gene and risk of restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Silke Kullmann; Priska Binner; Kirsten Rackebrandt; Andreas Huge; Georg Haltern; Mark Lankisch; Reiner Füth; Eberhard von Hodenberg; Hans-Peter Bestehorn; Thomas Scheffold
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2009-10-08       Impact factor: 2.298

9.  Clinical outcomes after permanent polymer or polymer-free stent implantation in patients with diabetes mellitus: The ReCre8 diabetes substudy.

Authors:  Nicole D van Hemert; Rik Rozemeijer; Michiel Voskuil; Mèra Stein; Peter Frambach; Saskia Z Rittersma; Adriaan O Kraaijeveld; Geert E H Leenders; Pim van der Harst; Pierfrancesco Agostoni; Pieter R Stella
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2021-04-03       Impact factor: 2.585

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.