Literature DB >> 12652149

Use of discharge-worksheet enhances compliance with evidence-based myocardial infarction care.

David Nori1, Jeff Johnson, Alissa Kapke, Diane Lenk, Steven Borzak, Michael Hudson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prior studies demonstrate that effective secondary prevention therapies are underutilized in patients with myocardial infarction (MI) at hospital discharge. At a US tertiary center, we developed and encouraged providers to complete a simple "Acute MI Discharge Worksheet" (MIDW) designed to educate patients, prompt caregivers, and provide chart documentation regarding evidence-based therapies post-MI. METHODS AND
RESULTS: The MIDW was introduced in May of 2000 with use encouraged in all surviving patients with MI. We calculated a patient discharge score by summing the number of quality indicators (aspirin use, beta-blocker use, ACE-inhibitor use, smoking cessation, lipid-lowering therapy, cardiac rehabilitation referral) and compared documentation of quality indicators at discharge between patients without (Group I, n = 65) and with (Group II, n = 60) the MIDW. Group II was subdivided into those with an incomplete worksheet (Group IIa, n = 26), and those with a completed worksheet (Group IIb, n = 34). Greater documentation of secondary prevention indicators occurred in patients with incomplete and completed discharge forms present. Mean Discharge scores were significantly higher for Group II vs. Group I (4.98 vs. 3.88, p < 0.0001), and Group IIb vs. Group IIa, (5.47 vs. 4.35, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: A simple "Acute MI Discharge Worksheet" was associated with better adherence and documentation of evidence-based post MI care and be a useful component to improve post MI care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12652149     DOI: 10.1023/a:1022014321328

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis        ISSN: 0929-5305            Impact factor:   2.300


  12 in total

Review 1.  Adjunctive drug therapy of acute myocardial infarction--evidence from clinical trials.

Authors:  C H Hennekens; C M Albert; S L Godfried; J M Gaziano; J E Buring
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-11-28       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Improving quality of care for acute myocardial infarction: The Guidelines Applied in Practice (GAP) Initiative.

Authors:  Rajendra H Mehta; Cecelia K Montoye; Meg Gallogly; Patricia Baker; Angela Blount; Jessica Faul; Canopy Roychoudhury; Steven Borzak; Susan Fox; Mary Franklin; Marge Freundl; Eva Kline-Rogers; Thomas LaLonde; Michele Orza; Robert Parrish; Martha Satwicz; Mary Jo Smith; Paul Sobotka; Stuart Winston; Arthur A Riba; Kim A Eagle
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-03-13       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Cardiac rehabilitation after myocardial infarction. Combined experience of randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  N B Oldridge; G H Guyatt; M E Fischer; A A Rimm
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1988-08-19       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction).

Authors:  T J Ryan; J L Anderson; E M Antman; B A Braniff; N H Brooks; R M Califf; L D Hillis; L F Hiratzka; E Rapaport; B J Riegel; R O Russell; E E Smith; W D Weaver
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1996-11-01       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Clinical reality of coronary prevention guidelines: a comparison of EUROASPIRE I and II in nine countries. EUROASPIRE I and II Group. European Action on Secondary Prevention by Intervention to Reduce Events.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-03-31       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Intervention to improve adherence to ACC/AHA recommended adjunctive medications for the management of patients with an acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  S S Axtell; E Ludwig; P Lope-Candales
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.882

7.  Quality improvement initiative and its impact on the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  R H Mehta; S Das; T T Tsai; E Nolan; G Kearly; K A Eagle
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2000-11-13

8.  Quality of medical care delivered to Medicare beneficiaries: A profile at state and national levels.

Authors:  S F Jencks; T Cuerdon; D R Burwen; B Fleming; P M Houck; A E Kussmaul; D S Nilasena; D L Ordin; D R Arday
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-10-04       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Failure of information as an intervention to modify clinical management. A time-series trial in patients with acute chest pain.

Authors:  T H Lee; S D Pearson; P A Johnson; T B Garcia; M C Weisberg; E Guadagnoli; E F Cook; L Goldman
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1995-03-15       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Quality of care for Medicare patients with acute myocardial infarction. A four-state pilot study from the Cooperative Cardiovascular Project.

Authors:  E F Ellerbeck; S F Jencks; M J Radford; T F Kresowik; A S Craig; J A Gold; H M Krumholz; R A Vogel
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-05-17       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Effects of cardiac rehabilitation referral strategies on referral and enrollment rates.

Authors:  Shannon Gravely-Witte; Yvonne W Leung; Rajiv Nariani; Hala Tamim; Paul Oh; Victoria M Chan; Sherry L Grace
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2009-12-08       Impact factor: 32.419

2.  Examining the effect of a patient navigation intervention on outpatient cardiac rehabilitation awareness and enrollment.

Authors:  Lisa Benz Scott; Shannon Gravely; Thomas R Sexton; Sabrina Brzostek; David L Brown
Journal:  J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev       Date:  2013 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.081

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.