Literature DB >> 12651805

Comparison of two CYP2D6 genotyping methods and assessment of genotype-phenotype relationships.

Wen-Hwei Chou1, Feng-Xiang Yan, Doris K Robbins-Weilert, Thomas B Ryder, Wei Wei Liu, Clotilde Perbost, Maureen Fairchild, Jose de Leon, Walter H Koch, Peter J Wedlund.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There have been no published reports comparing the CYP450 GeneChip microarray assay with more standard methods of genetic testing.
METHODS: We collected 20-mL blood samples from 236 volunteers for DNA isolation and testing before each individual ingested 60 mg of dextromethorphan, and collected their urine. CYP2D6 alleles *3 to *7, *9, *17, and *41, and multiple CYP2D6 gene copies were tested by allele-specific PCR (AS-PCR), whereas alleles *2 to *4 and *6 to *11 were tested by the Affymetrix CYP450 GeneChip assay. Five of the CYP2D6 alleles (*3, *4, *6, *7, and *9) were tested by both AS-PCR and the CYP450 GeneChip assay in an independent and blinded fashion in 232 of the 236 healthy volunteers. The combined CYP2D6 genotype from both methods was used to divide the population into four subgroups, poor metabolizers (PMs), intermediate metabolizers (IMs), extensive metabolizers (EMs), and ultrarapid metabolizers (UMs), based on their relative function and ability to express the CYP2D6 gene. The urinary elimination of dextromethorphan was assessed in each of these CYP2D6 subgroups.
RESULTS: The CYP2D6*3, *4, *6, *7, and *9 alleles showed a high degree of concordance between the CYP450 GeneChip and AS-PCR methods (>99% concordance). The mean (SD) of the log[dextromethorphan metabolic ratio (MR)] in the four CYP2D6 subgroups was PM = 0.49 (0.38); IM = -1.24 (0.53); EM = -2.35 (0.61); and UM = -2.43 (0.38).
CONCLUSIONS: Oligonucleotide microarray technology is an efficient and reliable way to test for CYP2D6 gene variation based on five alleles compared by separate methods. The methodology is influenced by the quality and amount of DNA present. The log(dextromethorphan MR) is a highly variable index that appears to reflect the crude nature of the dextromethorphan MR as an indicator of CYP2D6 in vivo enzyme activity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12651805     DOI: 10.1373/49.4.542

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem        ISSN: 0009-9147            Impact factor:   8.327


  27 in total

1.  Analysis of genetic variations in CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6 and CYP3A5 genes using oligonucleotide microarray.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Dong; Huasheng Xiao; Qi Wang; Chunxiu Zhang; Xiuming Liu; Na Yao; Haihui Sheng; Haiyan Li
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-10-15

2.  Identification of CYP2D6 impaired functional alleles in Mexican Americans.

Authors:  Huai-Rong Luo; Andrea Gaedigk; Vasileios Aloumanis; Yu-Jui Yvonne Wan
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2005-11-08       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 3.  The AmpliChip CYP450 genotyping test: Integrating a new clinical tool.

Authors:  Jose de Leon; Margaret T Susce; Elaina Murray-Carmichael
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.074

Review 4.  Validation and quality control of protein microarray-based analytical methods.

Authors:  Larry J Kricka; Stephen R Master
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2007-08-03       Impact factor: 2.695

Review 5.  Contribution of allelic variations to the phenotype of response to antidepressants and antipsychotics.

Authors:  Wolfgang Maier; Astrid Zobel
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 5.270

Review 6.  Is antiarrhythmic treatment in the elderly different? a review of the specific changes.

Authors:  Vera H M Deneer; Norbert M van Hemel
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 3.923

7.  Development of a complex parent-metabolite joint population pharmacokinetic model.

Authors:  Julie Bertrand; Céline M Laffont; France Mentré; Marylore Chenel; Emmanuelle Comets
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 4.009

8.  Application of Model Informed Precision Dosing to Address the Impact of Pregnancy Stage and CYP2D6 Phenotype on Foetal Morphine Exposure.

Authors:  Sarah Badaoui; Ashley M Hopkins; A David Rodrigues; John O Miners; Michael J Sorich; Andrew Rowland
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 4.009

9.  High frequency of CYP2D6 ultrarapid metabolizers in Spain: controversy about their misclassification in worldwide population studies.

Authors:  M E G Naranjo; F de Andrés; A Delgado; J Cobaleda; E M Peñas-Lledó; A LLerena
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 3.550

Review 10.  Pharmacogenetic profiling in the treatment of heart disease.

Authors:  Gerald W Dorn
Journal:  Transl Res       Date:  2009-08-12       Impact factor: 7.012

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.