Literature DB >> 12651206

Antileukaemic activity of treosulfan in xenografted human acute lymphoblastic leukaemias (ALL).

I Fichtner1, M Becker, J Baumgart.   

Abstract

Treosulfan (L-threitol-1,4-bis-methanesulphonate; Ovastat(R)) is a bifunctional alkylating drug indicated for the treatment of advanced ovarian carcinoma. Recent data revealed immunosuppressive characteristics and substantial haematopoietic stem cell toxicity after repeated dosing of mice. Therefore, treosulfan is considered to be an alternative conditioning agent to busulfan (for example) administered prior to allogeneic/autologous stem cell transplantation of patients with haematological malignancies. An antineoplastic activity for treosulfan has been previously shown in preclinical models of melanoma, breast, lung and renal-cell carcinomas. Here, in vivo antileukaemic activity of treosulfan is compared with the activity of equitoxic doses of cyclophosphamide or busulfan for the first time using human acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL)-models of paediatric origin xenotransplanted into non-obese diabetic (NOD)/severe combined immunodeficient (SCID) mice. Treosulfan treatment achieved an optimum treated to control (T/C) value of 159% (survival time) against B-ALL-SCID 7 and a T/C value of 0% (tumour growth) against T-ALL-SCID 4 and proB-ALL-SCID 19, respectively. Complete regression of established subcutaneously (s.c.) growing nodules of ALL-SCID 4 and 19 was obvious and long-term survivors without tumour re-growth were observed. Equitoxic doses of busulfan (ALL-SCID 4, 7, 19) or cyclophosphamide (ALL-SCID 19) were less effective with regard to the numbers of complete regressions and the number of cured animals. Side-effects included myelotoxicity and a small reduction in body weight, but these were tolerable. Treosulfan can be considered a highly active antileukaemic drug whose corresponding clinical value is to be tested in appropriate protocols with leukaemic patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12651206     DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(02)00767-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  7 in total

1.  Toxicological effects of fludarabine and treosulfan conditioning before allogeneic stem-cell transplantation.

Authors:  Mats Remberger; Johan Törlen; Ibrahim El Serafi; Karin Garming-Legert; Andreas Björklund; Per Ljungman; Mikael Sundin; Moustapha Hassan; Jonas Mattsson
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 2.490

2.  Treosulfan, fludarabine, and 2-Gy total body irradiation followed by allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Boglarka Gyurkocza; Jonathan Gutman; Eneida R Nemecek; Merav Bar; Filippo Milano; Aravind Ramakrishnan; Bart Scott; Min Fang; Brent Wood; John M Pagel; Joachim Baumgart; Colleen Delaney; Richard T Maziarz; Brenda M Sandmaier; Elihu H Estey; Frederick R Appelbaum; Barry E Storer; Hans Joachim Deeg
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Conditioning with treosulfan and fludarabine followed by allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for high-risk hematologic malignancies.

Authors:  Eneida R Nemecek; Katherine A Guthrie; Mohamed L Sorror; Brent L Wood; Kristine C Doney; Ralf A Hilger; Bart L Scott; Tibor J Kovacsovics; Richard T Maziarz; Ann E Woolfrey; Antonio Bedalov; Jean E Sanders; John M Pagel; Eileen J Sickle; Robert Witherspoon; Mary E Flowers; Frederick R Appelbaum; H Joachim Deeg
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Treosulfan, Fludarabine, and Low-Dose Total Body Irradiation for Children and Young Adults with Acute Myeloid Leukemia or Myelodysplastic Syndrome Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: Prospective Phase II Trial of the Pediatric Blood and Marrow Transplant Consortium.

Authors:  Eneida R Nemecek; Ralf A Hilger; Alexia Adams; Bronwen E Shaw; Deidre Kiefer; Jennifer Le-Rademacher; John E Levine; Gregory Yanik; Wing Leung; Julie-An Talano; Paul Haut; David Delgado; Neena Kapoor; Aleksandra Petrovic; Roberta Adams; Rabi Hanna; Hemalatha Rangarajan; Jignesh Dalal; Joseph Chewning; Michael R Verneris; Stacy Epstein; Lauri Burroughs; Evelio D Perez-Albuerne; Michael A Pulsipher; Colleen Delaney
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Allogeneic stem cell transplantation after conditioning with treosulfan, etoposide and cyclophosphamide for patients with ALL: a phase II-study on behalf of the German Cooperative Transplant Study Group and ALL Study Group (GMALL).

Authors:  N Kröger; M Bornhäuser; M Stelljes; U Pichlmeier; R Trenschel; C Schmid; R Arnold; H Martin; M Heinzelmann; C Wolschke; R G Meyer; W Bethge; G Kobbe; F Ayuk; N Gökbuget; D Hölzer; A Zander; D Beelen
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 5.483

6.  Long-Term Outcomes of Treosulfan- vs. Busulfan-Based Conditioning Regimen for Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndrome and Acute Myeloid Leukemia Before Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Sheng Zhu; Gang Liu; Jing Liu; Qiuying Chen; Zhiqiang Wang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 7.  Treosulfan-based conditioning for inborn errors of immunity.

Authors:  Mary A Slatter; Andrew R Gennery
Journal:  Ther Adv Hematol       Date:  2021-05-20
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.