OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine whether there are age-related differences in vasovagal syncope. BACKGROUND: In those with suspected vasovagal (neurocardiogenic) syncope, tilt testing demonstrates different hemodynamic responses. These responses may be age related, reflecting differing underlying pathophysiology. METHODS: Using a two-stage tilt protocol with glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) provocation, 505 consecutive syncopal patients were studied. Their baseline characteristics and hemodynamic responses during both early and tilt-induced collapse were analyzed. Hemodynamic responses were classified using the VAsovagal Syncope International Study (VASIS) criteria: mixed, cardioinhibition, severe cardioinhibition/asystole, pure vasodepression, chronotropic incompetence, and excessive heart rate rise. Multivariate regression analyses were performed to determine the associations of the baseline clinical characteristics (including age) and the tilt-induced hemodynamic responses. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients were unable to tolerate tilt testing. Age was independently associated with distinct responses during tilt. Chronotropic incompetence was predicted by increasing age (odds ratio [OR] 1.04, p < 0.0002). Younger age predicted an excessive heart rate rise (OR 0.97, p < 0.0005). Pure vasodepression was more common in the older group (>65 years; OR 29.5, p < 0.0001), whereas severe cardioinhibition was much less common in the older age group (OR 0.18, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: There appear to be distinct pathophysiologies underlying vasovagal syncope in different age groups. Young people appear to have excessive cardiac and autonomic responses to stress, whereas older patients appear to have a more generalized cardiovascular decline, with attenuated cardiac and autonomic responses to stress.
OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine whether there are age-related differences in vasovagal syncope. BACKGROUND: In those with suspected vasovagal (neurocardiogenic) syncope, tilt testing demonstrates different hemodynamic responses. These responses may be age related, reflecting differing underlying pathophysiology. METHODS: Using a two-stage tilt protocol with glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) provocation, 505 consecutive syncopalpatients were studied. Their baseline characteristics and hemodynamic responses during both early and tilt-induced collapse were analyzed. Hemodynamic responses were classified using the VAsovagal Syncope International Study (VASIS) criteria: mixed, cardioinhibition, severe cardioinhibition/asystole, pure vasodepression, chronotropic incompetence, and excessive heart rate rise. Multivariate regression analyses were performed to determine the associations of the baseline clinical characteristics (including age) and the tilt-induced hemodynamic responses. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients were unable to tolerate tilt testing. Age was independently associated with distinct responses during tilt. Chronotropic incompetence was predicted by increasing age (odds ratio [OR] 1.04, p < 0.0002). Younger age predicted an excessive heart rate rise (OR 0.97, p < 0.0005). Pure vasodepression was more common in the older group (>65 years; OR 29.5, p < 0.0001), whereas severe cardioinhibition was much less common in the older age group (OR 0.18, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: There appear to be distinct pathophysiologies underlying vasovagal syncope in different age groups. Young people appear to have excessive cardiac and autonomic responses to stress, whereas older patients appear to have a more generalized cardiovascular decline, with attenuated cardiac and autonomic responses to stress.
Authors: Carissa Murrell; James D Cotter; Keith George; Robert Shave; Luke Wilson; Kate Thomas; Michael J A Williams; Tim Lowe; Philip N Ainslie Journal: J Physiol Date: 2009-12-15 Impact factor: 5.182
Authors: Steven Gilmore; Joseph Hart; Justen Geddes; Christian H Olsen; Jesper Mehlsen; Pierre Gremaud; Mette S Olufsen Journal: Med Biol Eng Comput Date: 2021-02-13 Impact factor: 2.602
Authors: Ashish Chaddha; Martina Rafanelli; Michele Brignole; Richard Sutton; Kevin E Wenzke; Stephen L Wasmund; Richard L Page; Mohamed H Hamdan Journal: Clin Auton Res Date: 2016-06-20 Impact factor: 4.435
Authors: Christoph Schroeder; Jens Tank; Karsten Heusser; André Diedrich; Friedrich C Luft; Jens Jordan Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-10-25 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Edward Koźluk; Gerard Cybulski; Agnieszka Piątkowska; Inga Zastawna; Wiktor Niewiadomski; Anna Strasz; Anna Gąsiorowska; Maciej Kempa; Dariusz Kozłowski; Grzegorz Opolski Journal: Arch Med Sci Date: 2014-12-22 Impact factor: 3.318