Literature DB >> 12650676

Evaluation of the skin sensitization potential of chemicals using expression of co-stimulatory molecules, CD54 and CD86, on the naive THP-1 cell line.

Y Yoshida1, H Sakaguchi, Y Ito, M Okuda, H Suzuki.   

Abstract

It has been known that dendritic cells (DCs) including Langerhans cells (LCs) play a critical role in the skin sensitization process. Many attempts have been made to develop in vitro sensitization tests that employ DCs derived from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC-DC) or CD34+ hematopoietic progenitor cells (CD34+ HPC) purified from cord blood or bone marrow. However, the use of the DCs in in vitro methods has been difficult due to the nature of these cells such as low levels in the source and/or donor-to-donor variability. In our studies, we employed the human monocytic leukemia cell line, THP-1, in order to avoid some of these difficulties. At the start, we examined whether treatment of the cells with various cytokines could produce DCs from THP-1. Treatment of THP-1 cells with cytokines such as GM-CSF, IL-4, TNF-alpha, and/or PMA did induce some phenotypic changes in THP-1 cells that were characteristic of DCs. Subsequently, responses to a known sensitizer, dinitrochlorobenzene (DNCB), and a non-sensitizer, dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) or sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS), on the expression of co-stimulatory molecules, CD54 and CD86, were examined between the naive cells and the cytokine-treated cells. Interestingly, the naive THP-1 cells responded only to DNCB and the response to the sensitizer was more distinct than cytokine-treated THP-1 cells. Similar phenomena were also observed in the human myeloid leukemia cell line, KG-1. Furthermore, with treatment of DNCB, naive THP-1 cells showed augmented expression of HLA, CD80 and secretion of IL-1 beta. The response of THP-1 cells to a sensitizer was similar to that of LCs/DCs. Upon demonstrating the differentiation of monocyte cells in our system, we then evaluated a series of chemicals, including known sensitizers and non-sensitizers, for their potential to augment CD54 and CD86 expression on naive THP-1 cells. Indeed, known sensitizers such as PPD and 2-MBT significantly augmented CD54 and CD86 expression in a dose-dependent manner while non-sensitizers, such as SLS and methyl salicylate (MS), did not. To note, the metal allergens such as (NH(4))(2)[PtCl(4)], NiSO(4) and CoSO(4) augmented significantly only CD54 expression. Taking advantage of a cultured cell line, measurement of the co-stimulatory molecules, CD54 and CD86, on naive THP-1 cells following chemical exposure shows promise for the development of a simple, short-term in vitro sensitization test.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12650676     DOI: 10.1016/s0887-2333(03)00006-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro        ISSN: 0887-2333            Impact factor:   3.500


  10 in total

1.  Targeting effector memory T cells with the small molecule Kv1.3 blocker PAP-1 suppresses allergic contact dermatitis.

Authors:  Philippe Azam; Ananthakrishnan Sankaranarayanan; Daniel Homerick; Stephen Griffey; Heike Wulff
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2007-02-01       Impact factor: 8.551

Review 2.  Application of proteomics in the elucidation of chemical-mediated allergic contact dermatitis.

Authors:  Tessa Höper; Franz Mussotter; Andrea Haase; Andreas Luch; Tewes Tralau
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 3.524

3.  Adenosine diphosphate involvement in THP-1 maturation triggered by the contact allergen 1-fluoro-2,4-dinitrobenzene.

Authors:  J D Martins; A Silva; I Ferreira; M Gonçalo; J B A Custódio; M C Lopes; M R M Domingues; B M Neves; M T Cruz
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2016-08-04       Impact factor: 3.524

4.  Functional and transcriptional profiling of MUTZ-3, a myeloid cell line acting as a model for dendritic cells.

Authors:  Kristina Larsson; Malin Lindstedt; Carl A K Borrebaeck
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 7.397

5.  Perspectives on Non-Animal Alternatives for Assessing Sensitization Potential in Allergic Contact Dermatitis.

Authors:  Nripen S Sharma; Rohit Jindal; Bhaskar Mitra; Serom Lee; Lulu Li; Tim J Maguire; Rene Schloss; Martin L Yarmush
Journal:  Cell Mol Bioeng       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.321

6.  Biodegradable Polymers Induce CD54 on THP-1 Cells in Skin Sensitization Test.

Authors:  Yeon Suk Jung; Reiko Kato; Toshie Tsuchiya
Journal:  Int J Biomater       Date:  2011-08-02

7.  The LLNA: A Brief Review of Recent Advances and Limitations.

Authors:  Stacey E Anderson; Paul D Siegel; B J Meade
Journal:  J Allergy (Cairo)       Date:  2011-06-16

Review 8.  In vitro methods for hazard assessment of industrial chemicals - opportunities and challenges.

Authors:  Chin Lin Wong; Sussan Ghassabian; Maree T Smith; Ai-Leen Lam
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 5.810

9.  Sensitization potential of dental resins: 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate and its water-soluble oligomers have immunostimulatory effects.

Authors:  Izumi Fukumoto; Atsushi Tamura; Mitsuaki Matsumura; Hiroyuki Miura; Nobuhiko Yui
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Interferon-induced protein IFIT4 is associated with systemic lupus erythematosus and promotes differentiation of monocytes into dendritic cell-like cells.

Authors:  Xiangyang Huang; Nan Shen; Chunde Bao; Yueying Gu; Li Wu; Shunle Chen
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 5.156

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.