Literature DB >> 12650467

Evolution of egg dumping in a subsocial insect.

Michael L G Loeb1.   

Abstract

Egg dumping, or abandonment of eggs and young to the care of other conspecifics, frees individuals from costs of maternal care while potentially imposing energetic and ecological costs on egg recipients. It is not clear, however, that egg dumping necessarily represents selfish manipulation of egg recipients, and in some ecological contexts, recipients may benefit from enlarged broods. Thus, egg dumping may either be mutually beneficial for dumpers and recipients or entail costs for dumpers that are compensated by other means, such as improving reproduction of genetically related egg recipients. Here I use field experiments to test the relative importance of manipulation (i.e., "parasitism"), mutualism, and kin selection in the evolution of egg dumping in the tingid lace bug Gargaphia solani. In support of mutualism and kin selection, I found that reproduction of egg recipient G. solani benefits from brood enlargement, most likely because eggs and gregarious nymphs find safety in greater numbers. But contrary to both parasitism and mutualism, egg dumper reproduction was not improved by offspring abandonment. Indeed, dumpers laid smaller clutches than recipients, and dumpers did not convert a survival advantage into greater future reproduction. Genetic analyses of a natural G. solani population revealed, however, that dumpers are related to their egg recipients. Moreover, Hamilton's rule showed that egg-dumping G. solani earn sufficient indirect genetic benefits for kin selection to favor the behavior. Thus, egg dumping in some species may be kin-selected cooperation rather than parasitism or mutualism.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12650467     DOI: 10.1086/344918

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Nat        ISSN: 0003-0147            Impact factor:   3.926


  6 in total

Review 1.  Hamilton's rule and the causes of social evolution.

Authors:  Andrew F G Bourke
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Prey attack and predators defend: counterattacking prey trigger parental care in predators.

Authors:  Sara Magalhães; Arne Janssen; Marta Montserrat; Maurice W Sabelis
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  The general form of Hamilton's rule makes no predictions and cannot be tested empirically.

Authors:  Martin A Nowak; Alex McAvoy; Benjamin Allen; Edward O Wilson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Can Hamilton's rule be violated?

Authors:  Matthijs van Veelen
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 8.140

5.  When cooperators cheat.

Authors:  Andrew G Zink; John M Eadie
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Social parasitism as an alternative reproductive tactic in a cooperatively breeding cuckoo.

Authors:  Christina Riehl; Meghan J Strong
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 49.962

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.