Literature DB >> 12649316

Effect of semicircular canal stimulation on the perception of the visual vertical.

Marousa Pavlou1, Nicole Wijnberg, Mary E Faldon, Adolfo M Bronstein.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The subjective visual vertical (SVV) is usually considered a measure of otolith function. Herewith we investigate the influence of semicircular canal (SCC) stimulation on the SVV by rotating normal subjects in yaw about an earth-vertical axis, with velocity steps of +/- 90 degrees /s, for 60 s. SVV was assessed by setting an illuminated line to perceived earth vertical in darkness, during a per- and postrotary period. Four head positions were tested: upright, 30 degrees backward (chin up) or forward, and approximately 40 degrees forward from upright. During head upright/backward conditions, a significant SVV tilt (P < 0.01) in the direction opposite to rotation was found that reversed during postrotary responses. The rotationally induced SVV tilt had a time constant of decay of approximately 30 s. Rotation with the head 30 degrees forward did not affect SVV, whereas the 40 degrees forward tilt caused a direction reversal of SVV responses compared with head upright/backward. Spearman correlation values (Rho) between individual SCC efficiencies in different head positions and mean SVV tilts were 0.79 for posterior, 0.34 for anterior, and - 0.80 for horizontal SCCs. Three-dimensional video-oculography showed that SVV and torsional eye position measurements were highly correlated (0.83) and in the direction opposite to the slow phase torsional vestibuloocular reflex. IN
CONCLUSION: 1) during yaw axis rotation without reorientation of the head with respect to gravity, the SVV is influenced by SCC stimulation; 2) this effect is mediated by the vertical SCCs, particularly the posterior SCCs; 3) rotationally induced SVV changes are due to torsional ocular tilt; 4) SVV and ocular tilts occur in the "anticompensatory," fast phase direction of the torsional nystagmus; and 5) clinically, abnormal SVV tilts cannot be considered a specific indication of otolith system dysfunction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12649316     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00960.2002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  30 in total

1.  Direction specific error patterns during continuous tracking of the subjective visual vertical.

Authors:  S Keusch; B J M Hess; K Jaggi-Schwarz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Cognitive demand affects the gain of the torsional optokinetic response.

Authors:  Samanthi C Goonetilleke; Ian S Curthoys; Ann M Burgess; Hamish G MacDougall
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-07-14       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Lack of otolith involvement in balance responses evoked by mastoid electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Omar S Mian; Christopher J Dakin; Jean-Sébastien Blouin; Richard C Fitzpatrick; Brian L Day
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2010-09-20       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Head roll dependent variability of subjective visual vertical and ocular counterroll.

Authors:  Alexander A Tarnutzer; Christopher J Bockisch; Dominik Straumann
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-05-05       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  One step closer to a functional vestibular prosthesis.

Authors:  Chris J Dakin; L Caitlin Elmore; Ari Rosenberg
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Antihysteresis of perceived longitudinal body axis during continuous quasi-static whole-body rotation in the earth-vertical roll plane.

Authors:  M Tatalias; C J Bockisch; G Bertolini; D Straumann; A Palla
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Gravity dependence of the effect of optokinetic stimulation on the subjective visual vertical.

Authors:  Bryan K Ward; Christopher J Bockisch; Nicoletta Caramia; Giovanni Bertolini; Alexander Andrea Tarnutzer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Inferior vestibular neuritis.

Authors:  Ji-Soo Kim; Hyo Jung Kim
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 4.849

9.  Precision and accuracy of the subjective haptic vertical in the roll plane.

Authors:  Jeanine R Schuler; Christopher J Bockisch; Dominik Straumann; Alexander A Tarnutzer
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 3.288

10.  Electrical stimulation of semicircular canal afferents affects the perception of head orientation.

Authors:  Richard F Lewis; Csilla Haburcakova; Wangsong Gong; Daniel Lee; Daniel Merfeld
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.