Literature DB >> 12648694

Thoracoabdominal approach for right-sided hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Feng Xia1, Ronnie Tung-Ping Poon, Sheung-Tat Fan, John Wong.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Resection of a large hepatocellular carcinoma in the right liver or a small tumor located at the superior and posterior part of the right liver requires extensive hepatic mobilization. A thoracoabdominal approach might facilitate hepatic resection in such situations, but the safety and benefits of this approach remain unclear. STUDY
DESIGN: A retrospective study based on a prospectively collected database of 488 patients was performed to evaluate the perioperative outcomes of right-sided hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma using the thoracoabdominal approach (n = 92) in comparison with the conventional abdominal approach (n = 396).
RESULTS: The two groups were comparable in age, comorbid illnesses, liver function, tumor size, and underlying cirrhosis. There were more extended right hepatectomies in the thoracoabdominal approach group than in the abdominal approach group, but the difference was not significant (33.7% versus 26.0%, p = 0.14). A significantly higher proportion of patients in the thoracoabdominal approach group did not require blood transfusion compared with the abdominal approach group (66.3% versus 54.8%, p = 0.04). The operating time for the former group was longer (median 450 min versus 360 min, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in hospital stay (median 12.5 days versus 13.0 days, p = 0.82), overall morbidity (41.3% versus 38.6%, p = 0.64), or hospital mortality (4.3% versus 7.3%, p = 0.37) between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The thoracoabdominal approach is a safe operative approach that can facilitate resection of massive tumors in the right liver or tumors involving segments 7 and 8 without increased morbidity. Copyright 2003 by the American College of Surgeons

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12648694     DOI: 10.1016/S1072-7515(02)01763-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  13 in total

1.  Outcome of and risk factors for incisional hernia after partial hepatectomy.

Authors:  Shinji Togo; Yasuhiko Nagano; Chizuru Masumoto; Hideki Takakura; Kenichi Matsuo; Kazuhisa Takeda; Kuniya Tanaka; Itaru Endo; Hiroshi Shimada
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-01-23       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Hepatic resection is justified for elderly patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Kondo; Kazuo Chijiiwa; Mayumi Funagayama; Masahiro Kai; Kazuhiro Otani; Jiro Ohuchida
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 3.  Thoracoabdominal approach in liver surgery: how, when, and why.

Authors:  Matteo Donadon; Guido Costa; Andrea Gatti; Guido Torzilli
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2013-12-12

4.  Simultaneous lung resection via a transdiaphragmatic approach in patients undergoing liver resection for synchronous liver and lung metastases.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Mise; Reza J Mehran; Thomas A Aloia; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 3.982

5.  Routes for virtually guided endoscopic liver resection of subdiaphragmatic liver tumors.

Authors:  Takeshi Aoki; Masahiko Murakami; Akira Fujimori; Tomotake Koizumi; Yuta Enami; Tomokazu Kusano; Kazuhiro Matsuda; Kosuke Yamada; Koji Nogaki; Yusuke Wada; Tomoki Hakozaki; Satoru Goto; Makoto Watanabe; Koji Otsuka
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 3.445

6.  Validation of biological and clinical outcome between with and without thoracotomy in liver resection: a matched cohort study.

Authors:  Shintaro Yamazaki; Tadatoshi Takayama; Masamichi Moriguchi; Shunji Okada; Yuki Hayashi; Hisashi Nakayama; Tokio Higaki; Masahiko Sugitani
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Hepatectomy Combined with Diaphragmatic Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Diaphragmatic Involvement: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

Authors:  Tatsuya Orimo; Toshiya Kamiyama; Kenji Wakayama; Shingo Shimada; Akihisa Nagatsu; Yoh Asahi; Yuzuru Sakamoto; Hirofumi Kamachi; Akinobu Taketomi
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-06-25       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Impact of the thoracoabdominal approach on peri- and postoperative outcomes of hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Yukiyasu Okamura; Shin Takeda; Tsutomu Fujii; Hiroyuki Sugimoto; Shuji Nomoto; Akimasa Nakao
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Improving perioperative outcome expands the role of hepatectomy in management of benign and malignant hepatobiliary diseases: analysis of 1222 consecutive patients from a prospective database.

Authors:  Ronnie T Poon; Sheung Tat Fan; Chung Mau Lo; Chi Leung Liu; Chi Ming Lam; Wai Key Yuen; Chun Yeung; John Wong
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Optimal abdominal incision for partial hepatectomy: increased late complications with Mercedes-type incisions compared to extended right subcostal incisions.

Authors:  Michael D'Angelica; Sridevi Maddineni; Yuman Fong; Robert C G Martin; Michael S Cohen; Leah Ben-Porat; Mithat Gonen; Ronald P DeMatteo; Leslie H Blumgart; William R Jarnagin
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.