Literature DB >> 12648641

Comparison of secondary implantation of flexible open-loop anterior chamber and scleral-fixated posterior chamber intraocular lenses.

Cem Evereklioglu1, Hamdi Er, Necdet A Bekir, Mehmet Borazan, Ferhat Zorlu.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To analyze and compare the outcomes and complication rates of secondary implantation of flexible, open-loop, anterior chamber intraocular lenses (AC IOLs) and single-piece, scleral-fixated, posterior chamber IOLs (PC IOLs).
SETTING: Departments of Ophthalmology, Gaziantep University Medical Faculty, Research Hospital, Gaziantep, and Inönü University Medical Faculty, Research Hospital, Malatya, Turkey.
METHODS: This study comprised 124 eyes of 113 aphakic patients (61 men, 52 women) with insufficient capsule support who had secondary IOL implantation from January 1997 to June 2001. In Group 1 (n = 73 eyes), a flexible, open-loop AC IOL was implanted and in Group 2 (n = 51 eyes), a single-piece, scleral-fixated PC IOL. The mean follow-up was 34 months (range 6 to 53 months) and took place at several different clinical settings. The mean interval between the initial cataract operation and secondary IOL implantation was 63 months (range 6 months to 12 years). The postoperative outcomes, safety, efficacy, and complication rates were analyzed, and the preoperative and postoperative best spectacle-corrected visual acuities (BSCVAs) were compared.
RESULTS: The postoperative mean BSCVA was 20/34.8 +/- 45.2 (SD) in Group 1 and 20/32.1 +/- 33.7 in Group 2; the difference was not significant (P =.718). A BSCVA of 20/40 or better was achieved in 62 eyes (84.9%) in Group 1 and 45 eyes (88.2%) in Group 2. A BSCVA of 20/25 or better was achieved in 40 eyes (54.8%) and 33 eyes (64.7%), respectively. The difference between the 2 groups was not significant (P =.472). Complications occurred in 25 eyes (34.2%) in Group 1 and 13 eyes (25.5%) in Group 2 (P >.05). The most frequent complications in Group 1 were early transient corneal edema, intraocular pressure elevation, cystoid macular edema, hyphema, secondary glaucoma, and iris capture or pupil decentration and in Group 2, suture erosion, a tilted or decentered IOL, fibrin reaction, and vitreous prolapse into the anterior chamber.
CONCLUSIONS: The AC IOLs and PC IOLs were safe and effective for secondary implantation to correct aphakia. Secondary implantation of the scleral-fixated PC IOL seemed to provide a more favorable outcome and a lower complication rate than the open-loop AC IOL in complicated cataract cases with inadequate capsule and zonular support. As scleral-fixated PC IOL implantation is technically more difficult than AC IOL implantation, the decisive factor in choosing a secondary IOL is surgical experience. Long-term comparison of both techniques is required.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12648641     DOI: 10.1016/s0886-3350(02)01526-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  35 in total

1.  Late dislocation of an anterior chamber intraocular lens into the vitreous.

Authors:  Vuslat Pelitli Gürlü; Omer Benian
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-04-06       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  Sutureless scleral fixation of intraocular lenses: outcomes of two approaches. The 2014 Yasuo Tano Memorial Lecture.

Authors:  Ashkan M Abbey; Rehan M Hussain; Ankoor R Shah; Lisa J Faia; Jeremy D Wolfe; George A Williams
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Upside-down lens syndrome: ocular complications secondary to inverted implantation of the Kelman Multiflex anterior chamber intraocular lens.

Authors:  Robert E Fintelmann; Shane K Kim; David G Hwang
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 5.258

4.  Assessment of the safety and efficacy of primary retropupillary fixation of iris-claw intraocular lenses in children with large lens subluxations.

Authors:  Anju Rastogi; Apurva Goray; Prolima Thacker
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 2.031

Review 5.  Anterior chamber intraocular lens, sutured posterior chamber intraocular lens, or glued intraocular lens: where do we stand?

Authors:  Derick G Holt; Jason Young; Brian Stagg; Balamurali K Ambati
Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 3.761

6.  Corneal astigmatism correction with scleral flaps in trans-scleral suture-fixed posterior chamber lens implantation: a preliminary clinical observation.

Authors:  Li-Wei Ma; Dwight Xuan; Xiao-Yan Li; Jin-Song Zhang
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 1.779

7.  Results in comparison between 30 gauge ultrathin wall and 27 gauge needle in sutureless intraocular lens flanged technique in diabetic patients: 24-month follow-up study.

Authors:  Matias Iglicki; Dinah Zur; Hermino Pablo Negri; Joaquin Esteves; Romina Arias; Emanuel Holsman; Anat Loewenstein; Catharina Busch
Journal:  Acta Diabetol       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 4.280

8.  Anterior chamber lens implantation in vitrectomised eyes.

Authors:  G S Negretti; M Lai; P Petrou; R Walker; D Charteris
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 3.775

9.  Outcomes of a new suture technique for the treatment of dislocated intraocular lenses: locked loop on the haptic.

Authors:  Ugur Unsal; Berkay Akmaz; Deniz Kilic
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-06-26       Impact factor: 2.031

10.  Implantation of retropupillar iris claw lenses with and without combined penetrating keratoplasty.

Authors:  Florian Rüfer; Mark Saeger; Bernhard Nölle; Johann Roider
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-09-12       Impact factor: 3.117

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.