BACKGROUND: Management of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients implies the selection of the adequate ventilatory parameters, essentially PEEP and tidal volume (Vt), to prevent ventilator-induced lung injury. These parameters should be reset as the lung injury evolves. Among the different methods proposed for the adjustment of the ventilator, the measurement of the P-V curve has emerged as a useful, although debated, tool. Our aim has been to study the relationship between the different inflection points of the P-V curve in ARDS patients, and to assess the changes in the empiric PEEP and Vt (PEEP(emp), V(temp) following its use. METHODS: P-V curves were measured in 27 patients (lung injury score [LIS] >or= 2, 69 measurements) by means of the low-flow continuous inflation method. RESULTS: A lower inflection point (LIP) was found in all patients and, although it correlated with the PEEP(emp), there was only a fair concordance, so the PEEP was modified in 80% of the cases. The expiratory inflection point (EIP) was significantly lower than the LIP (6.3 +/- 1.7 vs. 8.1 +/- 3.2, P = 0.008). An upper inflection point was observed in 16 measurements (23%) and the Vt was reset in 20% of the cases. Both PEEP and Vt were readjusted on 10 occasions (14%). Only the EIP was significantly higher on the first 3 days of mechanical ventilation. The LIS was correlated with all the inflection points. There were no differences for any parameter independent of the cause of the ARDS (pulmonary/extrapulmonary). CONCLUSIONS: The quasi-static measurement of the P-V curve is a simple method, easy to interpret, for objective adjustment of the ventilatory parameters in ARDS patients as the lung injury evolves. The implementation of this strategy may vary the empiric clinical practice. The role of the EIP for the evaluation of the severity of lung injury deserves further investigation.
BACKGROUND: Management of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients implies the selection of the adequate ventilatory parameters, essentially PEEP and tidal volume (Vt), to prevent ventilator-induced lung injury. These parameters should be reset as the lung injury evolves. Among the different methods proposed for the adjustment of the ventilator, the measurement of the P-V curve has emerged as a useful, although debated, tool. Our aim has been to study the relationship between the different inflection points of the P-V curve in ARDSpatients, and to assess the changes in the empiric PEEP and Vt (PEEP(emp), V(temp) following its use. METHODS: P-V curves were measured in 27 patients (lung injury score [LIS] >or= 2, 69 measurements) by means of the low-flow continuous inflation method. RESULTS: A lower inflection point (LIP) was found in all patients and, although it correlated with the PEEP(emp), there was only a fair concordance, so the PEEP was modified in 80% of the cases. The expiratory inflection point (EIP) was significantly lower than the LIP (6.3 +/- 1.7 vs. 8.1 +/- 3.2, P = 0.008). An upper inflection point was observed in 16 measurements (23%) and the Vt was reset in 20% of the cases. Both PEEP and Vt were readjusted on 10 occasions (14%). Only the EIP was significantly higher on the first 3 days of mechanical ventilation. The LIS was correlated with all the inflection points. There were no differences for any parameter independent of the cause of the ARDS (pulmonary/extrapulmonary). CONCLUSIONS: The quasi-static measurement of the P-V curve is a simple method, easy to interpret, for objective adjustment of the ventilatory parameters in ARDSpatients as the lung injury evolves. The implementation of this strategy may vary the empiric clinical practice. The role of the EIP for the evaluation of the severity of lung injury deserves further investigation.
Authors: Bojan Rode; Marinko Vučić; Mladen Siranović; Ana Horvat; Helena Krolo; Mijo Kelečić; Aleksandar Gopčević Journal: Wien Klin Wochenschr Date: 2012-12-11 Impact factor: 1.704