Literature DB >> 12647134

Field boundaries as barriers to movement of hover flies (Diptera: Syrphidae) in cultivated land.

Steve D Wratten1, Mike H Bowie, Janice M Hickman, Alison M Evans, J Richard Sedcole, Jason M Tylianakis.   

Abstract

Field boundaries play an important role as refuges, food sources and corridors for invertebrates and vertebrates, and increasing farmland fragmentation impacts on these functions. However, hedgerows and other structures can also impede dispersal by flying insects. The current work uses the pollen of Phacelia tanacetifolia in hover fly guts as a marker to assess hover fly movement in farm landscapes. In the United Kingdom and New Zealand, Phacelia pollen was found in the guts of Ephisyrphus balteatus and Metasyrphus corollae (United Kingdom) and Melanostoma fasciatum (New Zealand) at distances up to 200 m from the source, when there were no barriers between the flowers and the traps used to catch the flies. The rate of decline over distance in the proportion of flies containing pollen was similar for the two countries. The extent to which four replicated field boundary types impeded hover fly movement was tested using post-and-wire fences, lines of poplars (Populus spp.) with gaps, dense poplars and controls (no potential barriers). Phacelia was planted on one side of each boundary, and along the centre of the control plots. The relative presence of the pollen in flies on both sides of the barriers showed that both types of poplar boundary restricted the movement of the flies, but the fence had no effect. In a separate experiment, gravid females of M. fasciatum were captured at a greater height on a shade-cloth fence than were non-gravid females and males. The implications of this work include the functioning and persistence of metapopulations and the influence of field boundaries on population recovery of beneficial invertebrates following pesticide-induced mortality. If field boundaries contribute to a temporal asynchrony between pest and natural enemy populations, this needs to be considered along with the well-established roles of boundaries as refugia for, and sources of, beneficial arthropods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12647134     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-002-1128-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  4 in total

Review 1.  Habitat management to conserve natural enemies of arthropod pests in agriculture.

Authors:  D A Landis; S D Wratten; G M Gurr
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 19.686

Review 2.  Methods for marking insects: current techniques and future prospects.

Authors:  J R Hagler; C G Jackson
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 19.686

3.  Habitat fragmentation, species loss, and biological control.

Authors:  A Kruess; T Tscharntke
Journal:  Science       Date:  1994-06-10       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  The population biology of Bromus tectorum in forests: distinguishing the opportunity for dispersal from environmental restriction.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Pierson; Richard N Mack
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 3.225

  4 in total
  8 in total

1.  Habitat corridors function as both drift fences and movement conduits for dispersing flies.

Authors:  Joanna H Fried; Douglas J Levey; Jerome A Hogsette
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2005-03-30       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  The structural and functional connectivity of the grassland plant Lychnis flos-cuculi.

Authors:  T Aavik; R Holderegger; J Bolliger
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  Context matters: the landscape matrix determines the population genetic structure of temperate forest herbs across Europe.

Authors:  Tobias Naaf; Jannis Till Feigs; Siyu Huang; Jörg Brunet; Sara A O Cousins; Guillaume Decocq; Pieter De Frenne; Martin Diekmann; Sanne Govaert; Per-Ola Hedwall; Jonathan Lenoir; Jaan Liira; Camille Meeussen; Jan Plue; Pieter Vangansbeke; Thomas Vanneste; Kris Verheyen; Stephanie I J Holzhauer; Katja Kramp
Journal:  Landsc Ecol       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 5.043

4.  Organic farming and landscape structure: effects on insect-pollinated plant diversity in intensively managed grasslands.

Authors:  Eileen F Power; Daniel L Kelly; Jane C Stout
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Landscape fragmentation and pollinator movement within agricultural environments: a modelling framework for exploring foraging and movement ecology.

Authors:  Sean A Rands
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  Flower resource and land management drives hoverfly communities and bee abundance in seminatural and agricultural grasslands.

Authors:  Andrew Lucas; James C Bull; Natasha de Vere; Penelope J Neyland; Dan W Forman
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Conservation of hoverflies (Diptera, Syrphidae) requires complementary resources at the landscape and local scales.

Authors:  Laura Moquet; Estelle Laurent; Rossana Bacchetta; Anne-Laure Jacquemart
Journal:  Insect Conserv Divers       Date:  2017-07-10       Impact factor: 3.182

Review 8.  Impacts of Wildflower Interventions on Beneficial Insects in Fruit Crops: A Review.

Authors:  Michelle T Fountain
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 2.769

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.