Literature DB >> 12647104

Sex and pollen: the role of males in stabilising a plant-seed eater pollinating mutualism.

Laurence Després1.   

Abstract

Some plants are exclusively pollinated by an insect whose larvae feed on their seeds. The net outcome of a single visit for the plant depends on the number of ovules fertilised by the visitor, the number of eggs laid, and the number of seeds eaten by each larva. Unlike other known plant-seed eater pollinating mutualisms, the globeflower-globeflower fly mutualism (Trollius europaeus-Chiastocheta spp.) is unique in that not only females but also males visit flowers, and both sexes are potential pollinators. I analysed the relative efficiency of Chiastocheta males versus females in transporting pollen and fertilising globeflower ovules. I show that there is no sex-specific morphological adaptation or behaviour to enhance pollen collection and transportation in Chiastocheta flies, and that males contribute to pollination. However, because of their smaller body size, males transport significantly less pollen than females. Less seeds are produced after a visit from a male than after a visit from a female. A single female visit contributes to about 12% of total seed production, and a single male visit to only 5.4%. Females tend to spend more time inside the flower than males, and the number of ovules fertilised is significantly correlated with the time insects spent inside the closed corolla. The lower efficiency of ovule fertilisation by a male's single visit is compensated for by the higher rate of flower visitation by males: a flower receives about twice as many visits from males as from females during a time unit. The contribution of males to pollination is of major importance with respect to understanding the evolutionary stability of the globeflower-globeflower fly mutualism, as males satiate pollen requirement of flowers, masking the antagonistic effect of ovipositing females.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12647104     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-003-1181-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  11 in total

1.  Generalization versus specialization in plant pollination systems.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 17.712

2.  Effects of pollen load size and composition on pollen donor performance in wild radish, Raphanus sativus (Brassicaceae).

Authors:  D L Marshall; J J Avritt; M Shaner; R L Saunders
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.844

3.  Population dynamics and mutualism: functional responses of benefits and costs.

Authors:  J Nathaniel Holland; Donald L Deangelis; Judith L Bronstein
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.926

4.  Sex ratio adjustment in fig wasps.

Authors:  E A Herre
Journal:  Science       Date:  1985-05-17       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Variation among floral visitors in pollination ability: a precondition for mutualism specialization.

Authors:  D W Schemske; C C Horvitz
Journal:  Science       Date:  1984-08-03       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Origin and evolution of Asian hominoid primates. Paleontological data versus molecular data.

Authors:  J J Jaeger; Y Chaimanee; S Ducrocq
Journal:  C R Acad Sci III       Date:  1998-01

7.  The cost of mutualism: interactions between Trollius europaeus and its pollinating parasites.

Authors:  Olle Pellmyr
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Effect of pollen load size and source (self, outcross) on seed and fruit production in highbush blueberry cv. 'Bluecrop' (VACCINIUM CORYMBOSUM; Ericaceae).

Authors:  M H Dogterom; M L Winston; A Mukai
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.844

9.  Oviposition by mutualistic seed-parasitic pollinators and its effects on annual fitness of single- and multi-flowered host plants.

Authors:  Åsa M Hemborg; Laurence Després
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  The evolution of obligate pollination mutualisms: senita cactus and senita moth.

Authors:  Theodore H Fleming; J Nathaniel Holland
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.225

View more
  2 in total

1.  Geographic and within-population variation in the globeflower-globeflower fly interaction: the costs and benefits of rearing pollinators' larvae.

Authors:  Laurence Després; Sébastien Ibanez; Asa M Hemborg; Bernard Godelle
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2006-10-18       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Geographical and within-population variation in the globeflower-globeflower fly interaction: the costs and benefits of rearing pollinator's larvae.

Authors:  Laurence Després; Sébastien Ibanez; Asa M Hemborg; Bernard Godelle
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2007-03-21       Impact factor: 3.225

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.