Literature DB >> 12645850

The reliability of frequency-doubling technology (FDT) perimetry in a pediatric population.

Kristine Becker1, Leo Semes.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Frequency-doubling Technology IFDT) Perimetry was introduced as a rapid, easy method for detection of visual-field defects in adults. Its reliability, howev, has never been tested among pediatric patients. The purpose of this study was to determine if children could complete a screening program of FDT Perimetry reliably and to define the age range over which it might be most applicable.
METHODS: Two hundred fifty-nine normal children (mean age, 10.7 years; range, 4 to 17 years) were asked to complete the FDT C-20-1 screening test as part of their general eye examination. The visual-field results were analyzed for reliability using the number of false-positive errors, fixation losses, and visual-field defects. For the purposes of this analysis, field results were considered unreliable with false-positives > or = 1 or fixation errors > or = 1. The visual-field test was also considered unreliable if > 2 sectors were flagged.
RESULTS: Data from 254 children were included in the analysis. Five children were excluded because of suspected malingering or ocular health diagnosis that may have produced a visual-field defect. False-positives were less than one for all but the youngest age group 14 years old). Fixation errors decreed with increasing age and fell below one (became reliable) at approximately 9 years of age, and remained less than one through 17 year. Visual-field loss for purposes of this study when present in more than two sectors was considered unreliable in this normal population.
CONCLUSIONS: Children ages 10 years of age and older can reliably complete the FDT C-20-1 screening field test using the strictest criteria, combining false-positives, fixation losses, and visual-field losses. These data are derived from normal subjects, who on complete eye examination, had no ocular disease or reason to suspect visual-field defects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12645850

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Optometry        ISSN: 1558-1527


  5 in total

1.  Comparison of Quality and Output of Different Optimal Perimetric Testing Approaches in Children With Glaucoma.

Authors:  Dipesh E Patel; Phillippa M Cumberland; Bronwen C Walters; Isabelle Russell-Eggitt; John Brookes; Maria Papadopoulos; Peng Tee Khaw; Ananth C Viswanathan; David Garway-Heath; Mario Cortina-Borja; Jugnoo S Rahi
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 7.389

2.  Tests for malingering in ophthalmology.

Authors:  Ali Ihsan Incesu
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  Testing the visual field of children and adults with Rarebit: The role of task repetition on sensitivity.

Authors:  Iryna Tachyla; Luca Battaglini; Michele Barollo; Simone Cosentino; Giulio Contemori; Luisa Pinello; Ambra Ciavarelli; Clara Casco
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Alzheimer's disease: screening biomarkers using frequency doubling technology visual field.

Authors:  Denise A Valenti
Journal:  ISRN Neurol       Date:  2013-09-25

5.  Comparison of visual field test results obtained through Humphrey matrix frequency doubling technology perimetry versus standard automated perimetry in healthy children.

Authors:  Sibel Kocabeyoglu; Salih Uzun; Mehmet Cem Mocan; Banu Bozkurt; Murat Irkec; Mehmet Orhan
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.848

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.