Literature DB >> 12645641

New frontiers and unresolved controversies in percutaneous coronary intervention.

Vladimir Dzavik1.   

Abstract

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has become a key modality of therapy of patients with coronary artery disease. However, with the exception of acute coronary syndromes, there is as yet no conclusive evidence from randomized controlled trials that PCI improves survival and outcome compared with optimal medical therapy. Randomized trials comparing PCI and coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with stable coronary artery disease conducted before stenting showed superiority of the surgical approach. Early results from stent trials continue to indicate better symptom relief and less need for repeat intervention with the surgical approach, although myocardial infarction and mortality are similar with the 2 revascularization modalities. In the setting of acute coronary syndromes, however, recent trials suggest superiority of an aggressive approach, including PCI, compared with a conservative strategy of medical therapy only. This benefit extends to patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction, including those with shock. In the latter setting, mortality remains high and novel approaches to protect myocardial metabolism and improve perfusion will be needed to further improve survival. The role of revascularization in patients with completed myocardial infarction and persistently occluded arteries is much less clear. Although the late open artery hypothesis is widely accepted and interventional cardiologists routinely open late infarct-related coronary occlusions, the available evidence to justify this strategy is weak. New devices, such as thrombectomy devices in thrombus-laden lesions and drug-eluting stents, offer promise, although all lack the degree of proof of benefit and safety typically required of new pharmaceutical agents. As new technologies and therapies with the potential to improve outcomes and decelerate the atherosclerotic process are developed, it will be important for investigators and industry to collaborate in incorporating these advances into ongoing and new trials testing the efficacy of PCI in all settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12645641     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(02)03147-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  5 in total

Review 1.  In stent restenosis: bane of the stent era.

Authors:  A K Mitra; D K Agrawal
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Long-term trends (1986-2003) in the use of coronary reperfusion strategies in patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction in central Massachusetts.

Authors:  Robert J Goldberg; Frederick A Spencer; Joseph Okolo; Darleen Lessard; Jorge Yarzebski; Joel M Gore
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2008-01-08       Impact factor: 4.164

3.  Long-term trends in the use of coronary reperfusion strategies in acute myocardial infarction: a community-wide perspective.

Authors:  Robert J Goldberg; Frederick A Spencer; Joseph Okolo; Darleen Lessard; Jorge Yarzebski; Joel M Gore
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.300

4.  Use of myocardial perfusion imaging to predict the effectiveness of coronary revascularisation in patients with stable angina pectoris.

Authors:  Allan Johansen; Poul Flemming Høilund-Carlsen; Henrik Wulff Christensen; Werner Vach; Mette Møldrup; Torben Haghfelt
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2005-04-12       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  To plug or not to plug?

Authors:  Joseph Varon; Robert E Fromm
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2004-02-24       Impact factor: 9.097

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.