| Literature DB >> 12643833 |
Mawlouth Diallo1, Yamar Ba, Amadou A Sall, Ousmane M Diop, Jacques A Ndione, Mireille Mondo, Lang Girault, Christian Mathiot.
Abstract
After 8 years of silence, dengue virus serotype 2 (DENV-2) reemerged in southeastern Senegal in 1999. Sixty-four DENV-2 strains were isolated in 1999 and 9 strains in 2000 from mosquitoes captured in the forest gallery and surrounding villages. Isolates were obtained from previously described vectors, Aedes furcifer, Ae. taylori, Ae. luteocephalus, and--for the first time in Senegal--from Ae. aegypti and Ae. vittatus. A retrospective analysis of sylvatic DENV-2 outbreaks in Senegal during the last 28 years of entomologic investigations shows that amplifications are periodic, with intervening, silent intervals of 5-8 years. No correlation was found between sylvatic DENV-2 emergence and rainfall amount. For sylvatic DENV-2 vectors, rainfall seems to particularly affect virus amplification that occurs at the end of the rainy season, from October to November. Data obtained from investigation of preimaginal (i.e., nonadult) mosquitoes suggest a secondary transmission cycle involving mosquitoes other than those identified previously as vectors.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2003 PMID: 12643833 PMCID: PMC2958533 DOI: 10.3201/eid0903.020219
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Emerg Infect Dis ISSN: 1080-6040 Impact factor: 6.883
Figure 1Map of the Kedougou area, Senegal, showing geographic position of villages and forest gallery where dengue virus serotype 2 vectors were collected.
Mosquitoes collected and dengue virus serotype 2 infection rates of potential vectors, Kedougou, 1999
| Species | June | October | November | Total | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. specimens captured | (No. positive/ total pools) | No. specimens captured | (No. positive/ total pools) | True infection ratea | No. specimens captured | (No. positive/ total pools) | True infection ratea | No. specimens captured | (No. positive/ total pools) | True infection ratea | ||||
| 2 | (0/1) | – | (0/0) | – |
| 27 | (0/6) | – | – | 29 | (0/7) | - | - | |
| 1,132 | (0/36) | 1,998 | (10/56) | 1.72 | [0.34] | 1,398 | (25/41) | 2.84 | [0.58] | 4,528 | (35/133) | 0.91 | [0.15] | |
| 21 | (0/7) | 2 | (0/1) | – | – | 32 | (0/5) | – | – | 55 | (0/13) | - | - | |
| 358 | (0/12) | 122 | (1/5) | 0.92 | [0.92] | 543 | (10/19) | 2.63 | [0.85] | 1,023 | (11/36) | 1.28 | [0.39] | |
| 1,064 | (0/35) | 682 | (8/22) | 1.45 | [0.52] | 392 | (8/13) | 3.06 | [1.17] | 2,138 | (16/70) | 0.84 | [0.21] | |
| 54 | (0/8) | 6 | (0/2) | – | – | 15 | (2/4) | 17 | [11.57] | 75 | (2/14) | 2.74 | [1.97] | |
| Other mosquitoesb | 5,549 | (0/197) | 3,366 | (0/165) | – | – | 7,984 | (0/276) | – | – | 24,747 | (0/638) | - | - |
aTrue infection rate (ratio in percentage of the number of dengue virus serotype 2 strains isolated/total number of mosquitoes captured); [standard error]; –, no data obtained. bOther mosquitoes: Anopheles coustani, An. ziemanni, An. brohieri, An. brunnipes, An. domicola, An. flavicosta, An. funestus, An. gambiae s.l., An. hancoki, An. maculipalpis, An. nili, An. pharoensis, An. pretoriensis, An. rufipes, An. squamosus, Ae. argenteopunctatus, Ae. centropunctatus, Ae. dalzieli, Ae. fowleri, Ae. hirsutus, Ae. minutus, Ae. ochraceus, Ae. vexans, Ae. vittatus, Ae; mcintoshi, Ae. cozi, Ae. metallicus, Ae. neoafricanus, Ae. unilineatus, Culex annulioris, Cx. antennatus, Cx. bitaeniorhynchus, Cx. decens, Cx. duttoni, Cx. ethiopicus, Cx. neavei, Cx. perfuscus, Cx. poicilipes, Cx. tritaeniorhynchus, Cx. cinereus, Cx. nebulosus, Cx. tigripes, Mansonia africana, Ma. uniformis, Mimomyia mediolineata, Mi. mimomyiaformis, Mi. plumosa, Uranotaenia fusca, Ur. mashonaensis, Ur. balfouri, and Ur. mayeri.
Temporal and spatial distribution of vector activity and infection in Kedougou, 1999a
| Species | Nos. and ratesa | Mosquitos captured in forest gallery | Ngari | Silling | Bandafassi | Kénioto | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| June | Oct | Nov | June | Oct | Nov | June | Oct | Nov | June | Oct | Nov | Nov | ||
| n | 1 | – | 8 | – | 1 | 7 | 1 | – | – | – | – | 3 | 2 | |
| n | 1,053 | 1,586 | 1,204 | 2 | 315 | 110 | 37 | 33 | 23 | 21 | 66 | 50 | 18 | |
|
| BR | 3.25 | 5.87 | 3.65 | 0.16 | 8.75 | 3.66 | 2.05 | 2.5 | 1.27 | 1.75 | 5.5 | 4.17 | 1 |
|
| TIR | – | 0.51 | 2.99 | – | – | 2.85 | – | 3.13 | – | – | 16.12 | – | 5.55 |
|
| EIR | – | 0.08 | 0.32 | – | – | 0.31 | – | 0.23 | – | – | 2.67 | – | 0.65 |
| n | 1,063 | 682 | 390 | – |
| 2 | 1 | – |
| – |
| – | - | |
|
| BR | 3.28 | 2.52 | 1.18 | – | – | 0.07 | 0.05 | – |
| – | – | – | - |
|
| TIR | - | 1.45 | 3.09 | – | – | – | – |
| – | – | – | – | - |
|
| EIR | – | 0.11 | 0.11 | – | – |
|
| – | – | – |
| – | - |
| n | 45 | 5 | 15 | 5 | 1 | – | 4 | – | – | 1 | – | – | - | |
|
| BR | 0.13 | 0.45 | 0.04 | 0.42 | 0.03 | – | 0.22 |
|
| 0.08 | – | – | - |
|
| TIR | – | – | 17 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | - |
|
| EIR | – | – | 0.02 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | - |
| n | 21 | 2 | 32 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | - | |
| n | 358 | 122 | 543 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | - | |
|
| BR | 1.1 | 0.45 | 1.64 | – | – | – | – | – |
| – |
| – | - |
|
| TIR | - | 0.92 | 2.63 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | - |
| EIR | - | 0.01 | 0.13 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | - | |
a n, number of specimens captured; BR, biting rate (number of mosquitoes captured per human per hour); Oct, October; Nov, November; TIR, true infection rate (estimated number of positive mosquitoes per 100 mosquitoes tested according to Chiang and Reeves [18] and Walter et al. [19]); EIR, entomologic inoculation rate (number of infected mosquito bites per human per evening); –, no data obtained.
Mosquito adults emerging from tree hole samples
| Mosquito species | No. of specimens | No. of pools | DENV-2a isolations |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 75 | 2 | 0 |
|
| 1 | 1 | 0 |
|
| 24 | 2 | 0 |
|
| 27 | 1 | 0 |
|
| 16 | 2 | 0 |
|
| 1,305 | 26 | 0 |
|
| 331 | 15 | 0 |
|
| 510 | 16 | 0 |
|
| 134 | 3 | 0 |
| Total | 2,423 | 68 | 0 |
aDENV-2, dengue virus serotype 2.
Figure 2Seasonal rainfall anomalies in Kedougou, Senegal, 1972–1999. Anomalies were calculated by subtracting the recorded seasonal rainfall during May to October in each year from the seasonal rainfall mean (normal), 1961–1990.