Literature DB >> 12642557

Discrepancy between actual and estimated speeds of drivers in the presence of child pedestrians.

N Harré1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: First, to measure the speeds of vehicles with and without children on the footpath, and second to compare these with drivers' estimates of how fast they would go in these conditions.
DESIGN: The speeds of vehicles in three conditions: control (no children present), children playing with a ball on the footpath, and children waiting to cross the road, were measured using speed tubes during two 55 minute sessions. Drivers' estimates of their speeds were measured with a questionnaire.
SETTING: Speeds were measured on a main road in Auckland, New Zealand. The questionnaire was conducted at another time with drivers stopping for petrol approximately 500 metres from the measurement site.
SUBJECTS: A total of 1446 speed measurements were taken and 93 drivers' questionnaire responses were analysed.
RESULTS: The mean free speed of vehicles in the control condition was 55.60 kph, with drivers' estimates being 56.37 kph. When children were playing with a ball the measured speed was 54.29 kph and the estimated speed 39.27 kph. When children were waiting to cross the measured speed was 52.78 kph, estimated speed 34.02 kph. Analyses indicated that there were significant differences between measured and estimated speeds.
CONCLUSIONS: New Zealand drivers make inadequate speed adjustments in the presence of children, despite probably believing they do so. Establishing specific rules about appropriate speeds around children and highlighting to drivers the discrepancy between their attitudes and behaviour are two intervention strategies suggested.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12642557      PMCID: PMC1730929          DOI: 10.1136/ip.9.1.38

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Inj Prev        ISSN: 1353-8047            Impact factor:   2.399


  17 in total

1.  Drivers' biased perceptions of speed and safety campaign messages.

Authors:  D Walton; P C McKeown
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  2001-09

2.  Measuring community/environmental interventions: the Child Pedestrian Injury Prevention Project.

Authors:  M Stevenson; H Iredell; P Howat; D Cross; M Hall
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.399

3.  The severity of pedestrian injuries in children: an analysis of the Pedestrian Injury Causation Study.

Authors:  R Pitt; B Guyer; C C Hsieh; M Malek
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  1990-12

4.  Errors in young children's decisions about traffic gaps: experiments with roadside simulations.

Authors:  J D Demetre; D N Lee; T K Pitcairn; R Grieve; J A Thomson; K Ampofo-Boateng
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  1992-05

5.  The epidemiology and prevention of child pedestrian injury.

Authors:  M Malek; B Guyer; I Lescohier
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  1990-08

6.  Preventing child pedestrian injury: pedestrian education or traffic calming?

Authors:  I Roberts; T Ashton; R Dunn; T Lee-Joe
Journal:  Aust J Public Health       Date:  1994-06

7.  Driver behaviour in the presence of child and adult pedestrians.

Authors:  S J Thompson; E J Fraser; C I Howarth
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 2.778

8.  A geographic analysis of motor vehicle collisions with child pedestrians in Long Beach, California: comparing intersection and midblock incident locations.

Authors:  A S Lightstone; P K Dhillon; C Peek-Asa; J F Kraus
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.399

9.  Child pedestrian injuries in the United States. Current status of the problem, potential interventions, and future research needs.

Authors:  F P Rivara
Journal:  Am J Dis Child       Date:  1990-06

10.  The urban traffic environment and the risk of child pedestrian injury: a case-crossover approach.

Authors:  I Roberts; R Marshall; T Lee-Joe
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.822

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.