Literature DB >> 12642200

Information on video format can help patients with localised prostate cancer to be partners in decision making.

Sandra McGregor1.   

Abstract

A video was produced to inform men diagnosed with localised prostate cancer of the different management options for their disease. It was tested for increased knowledge and understanding on a healthy population of similar age (n=10), who were assessed before and after watching the video (20 interviews). The video was then shown to 12 men who had been diagnosed with prostate cancer but had not started any treatment for their disease (24 interviews). Interviews among the healthy cohort revealed not only the lack of knowledge of anatomy and physiology but also the way in which these men used past experiences to help explain and remember complex medical procedures. The patients focused on the treatments and outcomes, remembering less of the technicalities. All men interviewed vividly remembered the patients participating in the video; they drew inferences and developed affinity towards specific individuals. Both groups felt that video provided information in a user friendly way. Although remembering few anatomical terms all participants described a visual image that led to a perception of understanding rather than a definitive increase in knowledge. Patients, however, felt they had a clearer understanding of the disease and its treatment, and therefore better able to be active informed partners in the decision-making process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12642200     DOI: 10.1016/s0738-3991(02)00187-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient Educ Couns        ISSN: 0738-3991


  10 in total

1.  Assessment of the use and feasibility of video to supplement the genetic counseling process: a cancer genetic counseling perspective.

Authors:  J E Axilbund; L A Hamby; D B Thompson; S J Olsen; C A Griffin
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Development and evaluation of an audiovisual information resource to promote self-management of chemotherapy side-effects.

Authors:  Mariko Carey; Michael Jefford; Penelope Schofield; Siobhan Kelly; Meinir Krishnasamy; Sanchia Aranda
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2006-02-01       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  The Impact of Genetic Counseling Educational Tools on Patients' Knowledge of Molecular Testing Terminology.

Authors:  Brianna A McDaniels; Rachel S Hianik; Cecelia Bellcross; Walid L Shaib; Jeffrey Switchenko; Margie D Dixon; Jane L Meisel; Keerthi Gogineni; Rebecca D Pentz
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 2.037

4.  Decision aids for localized prostate cancer in diverse minority men: Primary outcome results from a multicenter cancer care delivery trial (Alliance A191402CD).

Authors:  Jon C Tilburt; David Zahrieh; Joel E Pacyna; Daniel G Petereit; Judith S Kaur; Bruce D Rapkin; Robert L Grubb; George J Chang; Michael J Morris; Evan Z Kovac; Kara N Babaian; Jeff A Sloan; Ethan M Basch; Elizabeth S Peil; Amylou C Dueck; Paul J Novotny; Electra D Paskett; Jan C Buckner; Daniel D Joyce; Victor M Montori; Dominick L Frosch; Robert J Volk; Simon P Kim
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 6.921

Review 5.  Men's and carers' experiences of care for prostate cancer: a narrative literature review.

Authors:  Paul Sinfield; Richard Baker; Janette Camosso-Stefinovic; Andrew M Colman; Carolyn Tarrant; John K Mellon; William Steward; Roger Kockelbergh; Shona Agarwal
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.377

6.  An audiovisual information resource to assist in the transition from completion of potentially curative treatment for cancer through to survivorship: a systematic development process.

Authors:  A Karahalios; C Baravelli; M Carey; P Schofield; A Pollard; S Aranda; J Franklin; M Jefford
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.442

7.  The Conversations About Cancer (CAC) Project-Phase II: National findings from viewing When Cancer Calls…and implications for Entertainment-Education (E-E).

Authors:  Wayne A Beach; David M Dozier; Mary K Buller; Kyle Gutzmer; Lyndsay Fluharty; Valerie H Myers; David B Buller
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2015-10-17

Review 8.  Interventions that Facilitate Shared Decision-Making in Cancers with Active Surveillance as Treatment Option: a Systematic Review of Literature.

Authors:  G E Collée; B J van der Wilk; J J B van Lanschot; J J Busschbach; L Timmermans; S M Lagarde; L W Kranenburg
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 5.075

9.  A randomised controlled study of an audiovisual patient information intervention on informed consent and recruitment to cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  C Hutchison; C Cowan; T McMahon; J Paul
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2007-09-17       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Evaluation of a video-based Internet intervention as preparation for inpatient psychosomatic rehabilitation: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jan Becker; Manfred E Beutel; Katharina Gerzymisch; Dirk Schulz; Martin Siepmann; Rudolf J Knickenberg; Stefan Schmädeke; Peter Ferdinand; Rüdiger Zwerenz
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2016-06-13       Impact factor: 2.279

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.