Literature DB >> 12641867

Costs of drug delivery for CHOP, COP/CVP, and fludarabine: an international assessment.

Michael Herold1, Klaus Hieke.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this analysis was to assess the real-life direct costs of drug delivery for frequently used chemotherapeutic regimens in patients with relapsed low-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL).
METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of direct costs of drug delivery (acquisition plus administration) of relapsed low-grade NHL in 424 patients in Canada, Germany, and Italy. Results were expressed as an average treatment cost per patient for six cycles of chemotherapy. Exchange rates used were $1 (Canada)= currency 0.672, 1 DM (Germany)= currency 0.511, and 1 Lit (Italy)= currency 0.000517.
RESULTS: Direct costs of drug delivery were greater for inpatients receiving fludarabine (Canada currency 12,669; Italy currency 13,027) than for CHOP (Canada currency 7856; Germany currency 7218; Italy currency 4251) or COP/CVP (Canada currency 7360; Germany currency 8449). Treatment administration setting was a major cost driver with inpatient treatment up to 9-fold more expensive than the same regimen given to outpatients. Drug administration costs comprised the largest proportion of the total for each regimen in the inpatient setting (69-98%). Costs of drug delivery in the outpatient setting were 10% to 65% of those in the inpatient setting. Again, fludarabine was more expensive (Italy currency 8493; Canada currency 7269) than CHOP (Canada currency 4403; Germany currency 2150; Italy currency 1264) and COP/CVP (Canada currency 3009; Germany currency 867). Administration costs were 2.5- to 15-fold higher for inpatients compared to outpatients.
CONCLUSIONS: Costs of drug administration are a major driver for total direct treatment costs in the treatment of relapsed low-grade NHL and are at least as important as drug acquisition costs. Drug administration practices, in terms of inpatient or outpatient treatment, are a major factor in determining overall direct costs. Therapeutic strategies, which offer shortened treatment duration and/or a simple mode of administration, are likely to be economically attractive.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12641867     DOI: 10.1046/j.1524-4733.2003.00227.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Value Health        ISSN: 1098-3015            Impact factor:   5.725


  3 in total

1.  Costs of treatment of colorectal cancer in different settings in Germany.

Authors:  Klaus Hieke; Ulrich R Kleeberg; Martina Stauch; Axel Grothey
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2004-10

Review 2.  Fludarabine: a review of its use in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Authors:  Vanessa R Anderson; Caroline M Perry
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 3.  R-CHOP versus R-CVP in the treatment of follicular lymphoma: a meta-analysis and critical appraisal of current literature.

Authors:  Ganguly Siddhartha; Patel Vijay
Journal:  J Hematol Oncol       Date:  2009-03-24       Impact factor: 17.388

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.