Literature DB >> 12641697

Evolution of accommodative function and development of ocular movements in children.

R Jiménez1, M D González, M A Pérez, J A García.   

Abstract

The evolution of the accommodative function and development of ocular movement are evaluated in a non-clinical paediatric population (1056 subjects) aged 6-12 years, providing means for each age in the optometric tests that evaluate the accommodative amplitude, accommodative facility, accommodative response (lag), and saccadic movements. A comparison of these values between ages (anova) established three distinct trends in the behaviour of these parameters. The accommodative amplitude, measured by modified dynamic retinoscopy, and the evaluation of the saccadic movements by the development of ocular movements [developmental eye movement (DEM)] test showed continuous change with age. The values for monocular and binocular accommodative facility, measured by +/-2.00 D flippers, indicated the need to divide the population into two age groups (6-7 and 8-12 years). Finally, the means of accommodative response, measured by monocular estimation model (MEM) retinoscopy, and the direct observation of saccadic movement revealed no significant differences between ages, establishing a single mean reference value for the age group studied.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12641697     DOI: 10.1046/j.1475-1313.2003.00093.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt        ISSN: 0275-5408            Impact factor:   3.117


  13 in total

1.  Lens fluorescence and accommodative amplitude in pre-presbyopic and presbyopic subjects.

Authors:  Xianmin Luo; Steven M Kymes; Mae O Gordon; Steven Bassnett
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2007-02-02       Impact factor: 3.467

2.  Relationship between oculomotor scanning determined by the DEM test and a contextual reading test in schoolchildren with reading difficulties.

Authors:  Catalina Palomo-Alvarez; María C Puell
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Accommodative function in school children with reading difficulties.

Authors:  Catalina Palomo-Alvarez; María C Puell
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-08-28       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Binocular function in school children with reading difficulties.

Authors:  Catalina Palomo-Alvarez; María C Puell
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder children exhibit an impaired accommodative response.

Authors:  Beatriz Redondo; Jesús Vera; Rubén Molina; José Antonio García; Miriam Ouadi; Antonio Muñoz-Hoyos; Raimundo Jiménez
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Subjective versus objective accommodative amplitude: preschool to presbyopia.

Authors:  Heather A Anderson; Karla K Stuebing
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 1.973

7.  Clinical factors associated with moderate hyperopia in preschool children with normal stereopsis and visual acuity.

Authors: 
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 1.220

8.  [Measurement of accommodation using optical biometry].

Authors:  A Nurispahic; K Kotliar; I Lanzl
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.059

9.  Normative Data for Nonstrabismic Binocular Vision Parameters in African Schoolchildren.

Authors:  Charles Darko-Takyi; Vanessa R Moodley; Samuel B Boadi-Kusi
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 1.973

10.  Developmental Eye Movement (DEM) Test Norms for Mandarin Chinese-Speaking Chinese Children.

Authors:  Yachun Xie; Chunmei Shi; Meiling Tong; Min Zhang; Tingting Li; Yaqin Xu; Xirong Guo; Qin Hong; Xia Chi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.