Literature DB >> 12641651

DNA injection in combination with electroporation: a novel method for vaccination of farmed ruminants.

S Tollefsen1, M Vordermeier, I Olsen, A K Storset, L J Reitan, D Clifford, D B Lowrie, H G Wiker, K Huygen, G Hewinson, I Mathiesen, T E Tjelle.   

Abstract

Injection of plasmid DNA encoding antigens into rodents followed by electroporation improved the immune response when compared with injection without electroporation (Widera et al. J Immunol 2000;164:4635-40; Zucchelli et al. J Virol 2000;74:11598-607; Kadowaki et al. Vaccine 2000;18:2779-88). The present study describes the extension of this technology to farm animals, by injecting plasmid DNA encoding mycobacterial antigens (MPB70, Ag85B and Hsp65) into the muscles of goats and cattle using two different types of electrodes, both allowing DNA delivery at the site of electroporation. The animals were vaccinated under local anaesthesia without any observed immediate or long-term distress or discomfort, or any behavioural signs of muscle damage or pathological changes after the electroporation. DNA-injected and electroporated goats showed increased humoral response after the primary vaccination when compared with nonelectroporated animals. Improved T-cell responses following electroporation were observed in hsp65 DNA-vaccinated cattle. DNA injection with or without electroporation did not compromise the specificity of the tuberculin skin test. In conclusion, a protocol applying in vivo electroporation free of side effects to farmed ruminants was established. In addition, we show that DNA vaccination in combination with electroporation can improve the primary immune responses to the encoded antigens.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12641651     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-3083.2003.01218.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Immunol        ISSN: 0300-9475            Impact factor:   3.487


  17 in total

1.  Molecular and immunological characterization of a DNA-launched yellow fever virus 17D infectious clone.

Authors:  Xiaohong Jiang; Tim J Dalebout; Igor S Lukashevich; Peter J Bredenbeek; David Franco
Journal:  J Gen Virol       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 3.891

2.  Multivalent TB vaccines targeting the esx gene family generate potent and broad cell-mediated immune responses superior to BCG.

Authors:  Daniel O Villarreal; Jewell Walters; Dominick J Laddy; Jian Yan; David B Weiner
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Construction of eukaryotic expression vectors encoding CFP-10 and ESAT-6 genes and their potential in lymphocyte proliferation.

Authors:  Azam Torabi; Mojtaba Tahmoorespour; Fatemeh Vahedi; Nader Mosavari; Mohammadreza Nassiri
Journal:  Rep Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2013-10

4.  Effect of plasmid DNA vaccine design and in vivo electroporation on the resulting vaccine-specific immune responses in rhesus macaques.

Authors:  Amara Luckay; Maninder K Sidhu; Rune Kjeken; Shakuntala Megati; Siew-Yen Chong; Vidia Roopchand; Dorys Garcia-Hand; Rashed Abdullah; Ralph Braun; David C Montefiori; Margherita Rosati; Barbara K Felber; George N Pavlakis; Iacob Mathiesen; Zimra R Israel; John H Eldridge; Michael A Egan
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2007-02-28       Impact factor: 5.103

5.  Two doses of bovine viral diarrhea virus DNA vaccine delivered by electroporation induce long-term protective immune responses.

Authors:  Sylvia van Drunen Littel-van den Hurk; Zoe Lawman; Marlene Snider; Don Wilson; Jan V van den Hurk; Barry Ellefsen; Drew Hannaman
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2012-12-05

6.  Cellular immune responses induced in cattle by heterologous prime-boost vaccination using recombinant viruses and bacille Calmette-Guérin.

Authors:  H Martin Vordermeier; Shelley G Rhodes; Gillian Dean; Nilu Goonetilleke; Kris Huygen; Adrian V S Hill; R Glyn Hewinson; Sarah C Gilbert
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 7.397

7.  The relative immunogenicity of DNA vaccines delivered by the intramuscular needle injection, electroporation and gene gun methods.

Authors:  Shixia Wang; Chunghua Zhang; Lu Zhang; Jun Li; Zuhu Huang; Shan Lu
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2008-03-06       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 8.  Electroporation advances in large animals.

Authors:  Scott D Reed; Shulin Li
Journal:  Curr Gene Ther       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 4.391

9.  Heterodimeric barnase-barstar vaccine molecules: influence of one versus two targeting units specific for antigen presenting cells.

Authors:  Heidi Cecilie Larsen Spång; Ranveig Braathen; Bjarne Bogen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-18       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Skin electroporation: effects on transgene expression, DNA persistence and local tissue environment.

Authors:  Anna-Karin Roos; Fredrik Eriksson; James A Timmons; Josefine Gerhardt; Ulrika Nyman; Lindvi Gudmundsdotter; Andreas Bråve; Britta Wahren; Pavel Pisa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-09-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.