Literature DB >> 12641641

Predictors of 6-minute walk test results in lean, obese and morbidly obese women.

M Hulens1, G Vansant, A L Claessens, R Lysens, E Muls.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was first, to assess the presence of medical conditions that might interfere with walking; second, to assess the differences in walking capacity, perceived exertion and physical complaints between lean, obese and morbidly obese women; and third, to identify anthropometric, physical fitness and physical activity variables that contribute to the variability in the distance achieved during a 6-minute walk test in lean and obese women. A total of 85 overweight and obese females (18-65 years, body mass index (BMI) > or = 27.5 kg m(-2)), 133 morbidly obese females (BMI > or = 35 kg m-2) and 82 age-matched sedentary lean female volunteers (BMI < or = 26 kg m(-2)) were recruited. Patients suffering from severe musculoskeletal and cardiopulmonary disease were excluded from the study. Prior to the test, conditions that might interfere with walking and hours of TV watching were asked for. Physical activity pattern was assessed using the Baecke questionnaire. Weight, height, body composition (bioelectrical impedance method), isokinetic concentric quadriceps strength (Cybex) and peak oxygen uptake (peakVO2_bicycle ergometer) were measured. A 6-minute walk test was performed and heart rate, walking distance, Borg rating scale of perceived exertion (RPE) and physical complaints at the end of the test were recorded. In obese and particularly in morbidly obese women suffering from skin friction, urinary stress incontinence, varicose veins, foot static problems and pain, wearing insoles, suffering from knee pain, low back pain or hip arthritis were significantly more prevalent than in lean women (P < 0.05). Morbidly obese women (BMI > 35 kg m(-2)N = 133) walked significantly slower (5.4 km h(-1)) than obese (5.9 km h(-1)) and lean women (7.2 km h(-1), P < 0.05), were more exerted (RPE 13.3, 12.8 and 12.4, respectively, P < 0.05) and complained more frequently of dyspnea (9.1%, 4.7% and 0% resp., P < 0.05) and musculoskeletal pain (34.9%, 17.7% and 11.4% resp., P < 0.05) at the end of the walk. In a multiple regression analysis, 75% of the variance in walking distance could be explained by BMI, peakVO2, quadriceps muscle strength age, and hours TV watching or sports participation. These data suggest that in contrast with lean women, walking ability of obese women is hampered not only by overweight, reduced aerobic capacity and a sedentary life style, but also by perceived discomfort and pain. Advice or programs aimed at increasing walking for exercise also need to address the conditions that interfere with walking, as well as perceived symptoms and walking difficulties in order to improve participation and compliance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12641641     DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0838.2003.10273.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports        ISSN: 0905-7188            Impact factor:   4.221


  54 in total

1.  Walking capacity of bariatric surgery candidates.

Authors:  Wendy C King; Scott G Engel; Katherine A Elder; William H Chapman; George M Eid; Bruce M Wolfe; Steven H Belle
Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis       Date:  2011-07-23       Impact factor: 4.734

2.  Effects of obesity on slip-induced fall risks among young male adults.

Authors:  Xuefang Wu; Thurmon E Lockhart; Han T Yeoh
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Improvement in 6-min Walk Test Distance Following Treatment for Behavioral Weight Loss and Disinhibited Eating: an Exploratory Secondary Analysis.

Authors:  Jennalee S Wooldridge; Matthew S Herbert; Jeffrey Hernandez; Cara Dochat; Kathryn M Godfrey; Marianna Gasperi; Niloofar Afari
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2019-08

4.  Differences in neural activation to depictions of physical exercise and sedentary activity: an fMRI study of overweight and lean Chinese women.

Authors:  T Jackson; X Gao; H Chen
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2013-12-24       Impact factor: 5.095

5.  The Influence of Body Mass Index on Self-report and Performance-based Measures of Physical Function in Adult Women.

Authors:  Andrea L Hergenroeder; Jennifer S Brach; Amy D Otto; Patrick J Sparto; John M Jakicic
Journal:  Cardiopulm Phys Ther J       Date:  2011-09

6.  Feasibility and impacts of supervised exercise training in subjects with obesity awaiting bariatric surgery: a pilot study.

Authors:  A Baillot; W M Mampuya; E Comeau; A Méziat-Burdin; M F Langlois
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 4.129

7.  "I can do almost anything": The experience of adults with type 2 diabetes with a yoga intervention.

Authors:  Herpreet Thind; Kate M Guthrie; Santina Horowitz; Matthew Conrad; Beth C Bock
Journal:  Complement Ther Clin Pract       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 2.446

8.  Six-minute walk test for persons with mild or moderate disability from multiple sclerosis: performance and explanatory factors.

Authors:  Jane L Wetzel; Donna K Fry; Lucinda A Pfalzer
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 1.037

9.  Validity of Ratings of Perceived Exertion in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.

Authors:  Jessica L Unick; Sarah Gaussoin; Judy Bahnson; Richard Crow; Jeff Curtis; Tina Killean; Judith G Regensteiner; Kerry J Stewart; Rena R Wing; John M Jakicic
Journal:  J Nov Physiother Phys Rehabil       Date:  2014-07-07

Review 10.  Sarcopenic obesity: definition, cause and consequences.

Authors:  Sari Stenholm; Tamara B Harris; Taina Rantanen; Marjolein Visser; Stephen B Kritchevsky; Luigi Ferrucci
Journal:  Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.294

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.