Literature DB >> 12640607

End-of-life intensive care unit decisions, communication, and documentation: an evaluation of physician training.

Leonid A Eidelman1, Daniel J Jakobson, T M Worner, Reuven Pizov, Debora Geber, Charles L Sprung.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The majority of patients dying in intensive care units (ICUs) do so after the forgoing of life-sustaining therapies (FLST). Communication between physicians, patients, and their families regarding the decision to FLST has not been evaluated in Israel.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients who had FLST in a general ICU were enrolled in the study. We evaluated whether physicians communicated and documented the FLST decisions with patients or the patients' families. We also assessed the effect of the physician's geographic place of training on communication behavior.
RESULTS: Over a period of 8.5 months, 385 patients were admitted to a general ICU in Israel. Fifty-seven patients died or had FLST. Twelve of these 57 were excluded from the study. Thus, 45 (79%) patients had FLST and were enrolled in the study. All patients were deemed medically incompetent to make FLST decisions. In 24 (53%) patients, FLST was discussed with the family before the decision to forgo therapy. Discussion occurred later with 6 other families, who were unavailable at the time the FLST decision was made. In 15 patients, there were no discussions with families. American-trained physicians discussed FLST with 22 of 29 families initially and 5 other families later (93%), whereas the Eastern European-trained physicians discussed FLST with only 3 of 16 (19%) families (P <.001). Documentation of FLST was present in 26 (90%) patients of American-trained physicians and 8 (50%) patients of Eastern European-trained physicians (P <.001).
CONCLUSIONS: FLST is common in an Israeli ICU. Patients are not medically competent to make FLST decisions. American-trained physicians discuss and document FLST more often than Eastern European-trained physicians. Copyright 2003 Elsevier, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Death and Euthanasia; Empirical Approach; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12640607     DOI: 10.1053/jcrc.2003.YJCRC3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Crit Care        ISSN: 0883-9441            Impact factor:   3.425


  5 in total

1.  Advance directives and the family: French and American perspectives.

Authors:  David Rodríguez-Arias; Grégoire Moutel; Mark P Aulisio; Alexandra Salfati; Jean-Christophe Coffin; J L Rodríguez-Arias; L Calvo; Christian Hervé
Journal:  Clin Ethics       Date:  2007-09

Review 2.  Global variability in withholding and withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment in the intensive care unit: a systematic review.

Authors:  N M Mark; S G Rayner; N J Lee; J R Curtis
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  How clinicians discuss critically ill patients' preferences and values with surrogates: an empirical analysis.

Authors:  Leslie P Scheunemann; Thomas V Cunningham; Robert M Arnold; Praewpannarai Buddadhumaruk; Douglas B White
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 7.598

4.  End-of-life decisions: a cohort study of the withdrawal of all active treatment in intensive care units in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Hannah Wunsch; David A Harrison; Sheila Harvey; Kathryn Rowan
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2005-04-27       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Physician-related determinants of medical end-of-life decisions - A mortality follow-back study in Switzerland.

Authors:  Matthias Bopp; Yolanda W H Penders; Samia A Hurst; Georg Bosshard; Milo A Puhan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.