Literature DB >> 12639659

Neurophysiologic evaluation of central-peripheral sensory and motor pudendal pathways in primary premature ejaculation.

A Perretti1, A Catalano, V Mirone, C Imbimbo, P Balbi, A Palmieri, N Longo, F Fusco, P Verze, L Santoro.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Pudendal nerve somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs), the bulbocavernosus (BC) reflex, and BC perineal motor evoked potentials after transcranial magnetic cortical stimulation were performed in patients with primary premature ejaculation to investigate the somatic sensory and motor function of the genital area.
METHODS: Fourteen patients with primary premature ejaculation underwent psychological counseling, urologic physical examination, transrectal ultrasound examination, laboratory testing, and the Stamey test. The spinal and cortical pudendal nerve SEPs were performed by dorsal nerve stimulation at the penile shaft (DN-SEPs) in all patients and at the glans penis (GP-SEPs) in 3 of them. The BC reflex was obtained by stimulating the base of the penis.
RESULTS: The mean sensory threshold did not significantly differ between the patients and normal subjects. Cortical DN-SEPs were normal in all patients. The sensory central conduction time, calculated in 6 patients, was normal. The mean cortical DN-SEP amplitude was significantly smaller in patients than in controls. In 3 patients and in 3 controls who underwent both DN-SEP and GP-SEP testing, the glans penis sensory threshold was lower than the dorsal nerve threshold and the cortical GP-SEP latency was longer than the cortical DN-SEP latency. The BC reflex was normal in most patients. The BC motor evoked potentials were normal in all patients, but one.
CONCLUSIONS: We did not confirm either a faster conduction along the pudendal sensory pathway or a greater cortical representation of the sensory stimuli from the genital area in our patients. Moreover, we did not confirm hyperexcitability of the BC reflex in them. Our results suggest that the electrophysiologic approach is probably not sufficient to clarify the causes of primary premature ejaculation. A more integrated investigation could allow better results in this field.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12639659     DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(02)02284-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  6 in total

1.  A reassessment of penile sensory pathways and effects of prilocaine-lidocaine cream in primary premature ejaculation.

Authors:  J-D Xia; L-H Zhou; Y-F Han; Y Chen; R Wang; Y-T Dai
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 2.896

2.  Electrophysiological study of the bulbocavernosus reflex: normative data.

Authors:  Giuseppe Granata; Luca Padua; Fabiana Rossi; Paola De Franco; Daniele Coraci; Vincenzo Rossi
Journal:  Funct Neurol       Date:  2013 Oct-Dec

Review 3.  Treatment of premature ejaculation: new drugs and treatment strategies.

Authors:  Wayne J G Hellstrom; Jay W Heintz
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.862

4.  Significance of penile hypersensitivity in premature ejaculation.

Authors:  Liqiang Guo; Yuqiang Liu; Xuesheng Wang; Mingzhen Yuan; Yang Yu; Xiulin Zhang; Shengtian Zhao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Vibrator-Assisted Start-Stop Exercises Improve Premature Ejaculation Symptoms: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Daniel Ventus; Annika Gunst; Stefan Arver; Cecilia Dhejne; Katarina G Öberg; Elin Zamore-Söderström; Antti Kärnä; Patrick Jern
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2019-11-18

Review 6.  Advantages and limitations of current premature ejaculation assessment and diagnostic methods: a review.

Authors:  Shanzun Wei; Changjing Wu; Botao Yu; Ming Ma; Feng Qin; Jiuhong Yuan
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2020-04
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.