Literature DB >> 12639634

Cold-knife endoureterotomy for nonmalignant ureterointestinal anastomotic strictures.

Vassilis Poulakis1, Ulrich Witzsch, Rachelle De Vries, Eduard Becht.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the long-term results of cold-knife incision (CNI) of nonmalignant ureterointestinal anastomosis strictures (UASs) after urinary diversion in a consecutive series of patients.
METHODS: Since 1994, we have evaluated retrospectively 40 patients with 43 UASs, who were primarily treated with CNI (group 1). Six patients from group 1 with 7 UASs who failed primary CNI comprised group 2. After placement of an 8F nephrostomy tube, a 0.035-inch guidewire bypassed the stricture in an antegrade fashion under guidance of a centrally opened ureteral catheter (5F). A wire-mounted cold-knife was pulled through the strictured area in retrograde fashion under fluoroscopic control. Postoperatively, an 8 to 12F stent was left indwelling for 6 to 12 weeks. Successful treatment was defined as radiographic and scintigraphic resolution of obstruction and symptomatic relief.
RESULTS: In group 1, after removal of the stent, the ureteroenteric area remained patent in 26 (60.5%) of 43 UASs during a follow-up period of 38.8 months (range 12 to 85). The success rate at 1, 2, and 3 years was 86%, 67.8%, and 60.5%, respectively. In group 2, no success occurred. The diameter and length of the stricture, kidney function, hydronephrosis grade, presence of urinary infection at presentation, past CNI or radiotherapy, number of incisions with the cold-knife, and premature appearance of the anastomosis stricture were statistically significant influences on the outcome (P <0.05). Considering only the patients (n = 8) with the most favorable predictive factors (interval to stricture formation 12 months or longer, stricture length 1.5 cm or less, and hydronephrosis grade I-II), the success rate was 100%. No complications were observed.
CONCLUSIONS: CNI is an effective and minimally invasive treatment for primary UASs, providing durable results compared with other modalities used for endoureterotomy, and should be considered as an initial approach. The selection of patients with the most favorable prognostic factors leads to excellent results. As a secondary procedure, CNI was not successful.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12639634     DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(02)02503-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  5 in total

Review 1.  Getting out of a tight spot: an overview of ureteroenteric anastomotic strictures.

Authors:  Niyati Lobo; Sophie Dupré; Arun Sahai; Ramesh Thurairaja; Muhammad Shamim Khan
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  Retroperitoneal robotic-assisted laparoscopic reimplantation of a ureter into an ileal conduit.

Authors:  Jason M Durbin; Jeffrey Bejma; Brian K Auge; James O L'Esperance
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2011-06-10

3.  Ureterointestinal strictures following Bricker ileal conduit: management via a percutaneous approach.

Authors:  Paris Pappas; Konstantinos G Stravodimos; Theodoros Kapetanakis; Poly Leonardou; Georgios Koutallelis; Ioannis Adamakis; Constantinos Constantinides
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2008-03-05       Impact factor: 2.370

4.  Simultaneous antegrade and retrograde endoscopic treatment of non-malignant ureterointestinal anastomotic strictures following urinary diversion.

Authors:  Weiguo Hu; Boxing Su; Bo Xiao; Xin Zhang; Song Chen; Yuzhe Tang; Yubao Liu; Meng Fu; Jianxing Li
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2017-08-08       Impact factor: 2.264

5.  Endoscopic Procedures in the Treatment of Ureteroenteric Anastomotic Strictures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Xun Lu; Yiduo Wang; Qi Chen; Di Xia; Hanyu Zhang; Ming Chen
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2021-04-14
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.